 | This article was nominated for deletion on 22 January 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Notable?
editApparently, this question has been asked before (AfD linked to above): I'm concerned about the subject's notability. He has a few "points" in his favor:
- He apparently has an h-index of 10, which implies that he's somewhat well-known in his field. (This might be sufficient for tenure at many "research" universities.)
- His first listed paper alone has nearly 900 citations (which I assume was part of his dissertation).
- His dissertation is cited as "the first in-depth study of code refactoring as a software engineering technique". (Since it seems natural to re-examine one's work, I would assume that, in the general sense, "code refactoring" has been an aspect of software engineering since the beginning.)
I'm not sure these points are sufficient to show notability. Justin W Smith talk/stalk 19:03, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- It appears he also published under the name "Bill Opdyke": google scholar results. This would likely take his h-index to 11. Justin W Smith talk/stalk 19:13, 27 April 2010 (UTC)