Talk:William Palmer (murderer)

Latest comment: 3 months ago by OscarFred1952 in topic "His father worked as a sawyer"

Translation in french

edit

I begin it .signed : french user Arapaima --91.171.13.51 (talk) 17:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Translation in french completed

edit

Thanks to the author(s) for this typically GB delicious piece of gruesome humour ( & understatement) , which I enjoyed translating . I took the liberty , owing to the horse-race background ,to translate " murderous spree" into "emballement meurtrier" ( un cheval s'emballe = a horse bolts away ...). Are there yet , like in the 60' , young bright short-gowned girls on the paths winding over Rock-End ? Best souvenirs & regards to all GB .signé Arapaima , a french user --91.165.16.89 (talk) 10:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Coroner = police officer ?

edit

I thought better to leave the word "coroner" in my translation , but a contributor wrote " officier de police" in the stead ...I think a coroner is not a police officer , or am I wrong ? Thanks for precisions... signé Arapaima , french user --91.168.136.18 (talk) 17:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

A coroner is a "judicial officer", roughly a low-ranking judge, and certainly not a police officer. According to our article, in England and Wales he is required to be a doctor or lawyer of five year's standing, but this may not have been true in the 19th century, especially in rural areas. Our article on coroner has an interwiki link to fr:Médecin légiste. Bovlb (talk) 18:39, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wife's name

edit

I looked into this. Palmer's wife was the daughter of Col. Brookes and Ann Thornton: they were not married. Their daughter Ann or Annie was referred to as "Thornton" and also as "Brookes": see the references added. 92.233.48.153 (talk) 18:09, 15 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Reliable source?

edit

Several assertions in the article are sourced to http://www.staffspasttrack.org.uk/exhibit/palmer/default.htm, a personal website with the intention of challenging the received wisdom about Palmer. I doubt that this counts as a reliable source? Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 17:26, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I propose to remove this source. Cusop Dingle (talk) 17:46, 17 January 2012 (UTC) Done. Cusop Dingle (talk) 20:13, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Alfred Tharme or Palmer

edit

Is there any reason to change the name from Alfred Tharme to Alfred Palmer? If he was the illegitmate son of Palmer he would have taken the surname of his mother. More, I can't find a reliable source for his existence under either name. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 17:29, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

13 thoosant!

edit

£13,000 is between £1 and £9 million in today's money - depending on whether you look at inflation or equivalent wages - and he was still skint?

Put £13,000 on a horse and you'd be skint too.--EchetusXe 13:39, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
The evidence at the trial was that he was in debt to the tune of £12,500 to Thomas Pratt, a solicitor, on bills with forged endorsements. Cusop Dingle (talk) 19:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Defrauding his wealthy mother out of thousands of pounds

edit

The introduction uses the phrase "defrauding his wealthy mother out of thousands of pounds". Is there a source for that? The evidence at the trial was that Palmer had forged his mother's endorsement on bills, so that she would be thought by the lenders to have guaranteed them. (If he defaulted, his creditors would have approached his mother and his forgery would have been exposed.) This would not in itself have defrauded her of money, although it was a fraud on the moneylenders. Cusop Dingle (talk) 20:12, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Good point. This source has him borrowing money but it might be a stretch to call it fraud. --John (talk) 09:10, 19 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Cultural references

edit

This section should include the Alfred Hitchcock 1941 film "Suspicion" starring Joan Fontaine as a wife who believes her husband, played by Cary Grant, plans to murder her. One clue is that the husband has a book in a drawer with the title "The Trial of Richard Palmer." This Palmer is described as starting poisoning with brandy, and that he would have gotten away with it if he had not gone on to use actual poison. In the movie a friend of the couple dies after drinking brandy, and the husband lies to police about his whereabouts at the time of the death. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0034248/reviews — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.178.181.4 (talk) 10:47, 31 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

The radio program, "Crime Classics" had an episode titled, "The Hangman and William Palmer, Who Won?" broadcast on Oct. 7, 1953 about William Palmer and his killings (except for the children). I don't know if this is worth adding or not.Jtyroler (talk) 09:20, 28 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on William Palmer (murderer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:15, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

"His father worked as a sawyer"

edit

How does a person who saws wood for a living manage to leave his wife £70,000? I assume he owned one or more sawmills. This might explain his son so readily going to medical school. Time to examine the sources.--Quisqualis (talk) 02:27, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

I agree with Quisqualis, this doesn't make much sense - £70,000 in 1836 is equivalent to over £10 million, which isn't what you would expect a sawyer to leave in their will. I wonder if the original source for this got it wrong or has been misquoted. (Hayhurst, Alan (2008). Staffordshire MURDERS. Gloucestershire: The History Press. pp. 15–36) Anyone know? OscarFred1952 (talk) 18:51, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Reply