Talk:William Pomerance

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Animation: People Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Animation people work group.

Deletion

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I support speedy deletion of this article.Bali ultimate (talk) 00:28, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Follow-up

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Article is no longer up for speedy deletion, but is being watched for the potential addition of slanderous edits. - FlyingToaster 01:46, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Got it. Can live with article's existence, but creator has added back in/reverted info that's not so much slanderous as link farming at the moment. Edits of yesterday were changed to remove citations from text and add in links of irrelevance or of dubious provenance. Am fixing again.Bali ultimate (talk) 20:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

To anyone who wants to add sources:

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please note that Walt Disney's testimony before the House of Un-American activities is already cited in this article. Another copy of it, or a reporter saying that it exists, or a blogger mentioning that it exists, is redundant and not another useful source. Please only add a source if it is both notable and adds new information. Thanks. - FlyingToaster 21:00, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic