Talk:William Stukeley

Freemasonry

Stukeley's diary clearly states that he was made a mason in January 1721, before Montagu's installation. The Grand Master was a commoner, there is no commentary on numbers, and (obviously) there is no commentary on future events. The two statements about lodge numbers and later developments in Grand Lodge would be useful if referenced. Does anybody know where these quotes came from? Fiddlersmouth (talk) 00:25, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Incorrectly my foot

The article currently reads Stukeley

...incorrectly believed that the prehistoric megalithic monuments were a part of the druidic religion

which besides being unsourced is almost certainly a WP:LIE. It is undoubtably true that they were erected well before the people the Romans identified as druids were hanging around, but there's absolutely no way of establishing that the druids didn't consider themselves the continuation of a faith handed down by the original monolith builders; no way—short of archaeological digs establishing that absolutely no one visited the site for centuries during the Roman period—of establishing that they actually weren't; and no way of establishing that they weren't repurposed by the druids in some other fashion regardless of their original founders' intent. Removed pending clarification of some point he certainly got wrong (believing them to have been constructed c. 1st century BC, for instance). — LlywelynII 04:49, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

[edit: ...were created as part of the 1st-millennium BC druidic religion... seems to have been what they meant, but the 4th century BC dating could use a source and there's no real reason it needs to go in the lead. Should kind of go without saying that the very first people to look at Stonehenge critically but without any modern dating techniques would make mistakes.] — LlywelynII 09:32, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Bertram

Stukeley's involvement with Charles Bertram's forgery needs mentioning. — LlywelynII 09:32, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on William Stukeley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111201004813/http://www.plesiosaur.com/database/references/stukely/stukely1719.pdf to http://www.plesiosaur.com/database/references/stukely/stukely1719.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:53, 7 December 2017 (UTC)