Talk:William de Vere

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Catholicism Low‑importance

William de Vere is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Herefordshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Herefordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Herefordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HerefordshireWikipedia:WikiProject HerefordshireTemplate:WikiProject HerefordshireHerefordshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Predecessor and Successor

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hm.. The Handbook of British Chronology 2nd ed. (1961) is showing the predecessor as Robert Foliot and the sucessor as Giles de Braose. Some newer source show something different? Ealdgyth | Talk 03:38, 6 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Is there such a thing as too much citation? This article is littered with notes and yet more are called for to back up not only sentences but even phrases. And the references employ the awkward 1. ab... format. The Barrow article on William provides plenty of these references as it is the most complete study of the bishop's life and career to date, and there is no need to overload the entry with references. DeAragon 10:22, 16 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dearagon (talk • contribs)

Unfortunately, Wikipedia calls for citations pretty much for everything, even things that most scholars would not think need citation. It's not an encyclopedia just for scholars, but also for anyone reading, and so has different citation standards than other scholarly encyclopedias. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:12, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I haven't notice superscript numbers cluttering up most other articles on medieval subjects. If people know anything about citation, it is that, if an entire paragraph has only one citation--at the end--that citation covers the entire paragraph. Citing lots of sources contained in a later publication that is considered the most authoritative is something of a waste of time and effort. Just as here, someone substituted references to Barrow's article on Bishop William in Viator (1980s) with her entry on the bishop in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, so Barrow supersedes many earlier references.

If we were really going whole hog on the citations, we'd be citing manuscript and other archival materials, etc. Yet we're specifically told NOT to cite such materials. DeAragon 22:02, 17 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dearagon (talk • contribs)

Add topic