Willie Irvine has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 5, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Willie Irvine was the Football League First Division's top goalscorer in the 1965–66 season? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Willie Irvine be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Willie Irvine/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 21:26, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found.
Linkrot: two found and tagged.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 21:29, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Two dead links as noted above- Otherwise well referenced, no OR, spotchecks show sources support cites, RS, assume good faith for ofline sources.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Excellent coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- NPOV
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- stable
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Licences and captions OK, pity there is no picture of the subject.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- JUst relacements needed for the Lancashire Telegraph article which is not archived at the Internet Archive. I expect that you can find replacements. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:46, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- User:Arbero fixed the dead links; the website had just moved the pages. I didn't realise and messed things up, but it's all fixed now. Thanks for the review, just let me know if anything else needs fixing. Cheers, BigDom 09:45, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- OK, all good now, happy to list. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:56, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- User:Arbero fixed the dead links; the website had just moved the pages. I didn't realise and messed things up, but it's all fixed now. Thanks for the review, just let me know if anything else needs fixing. Cheers, BigDom 09:45, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- JUst relacements needed for the Lancashire Telegraph article which is not archived at the Internet Archive. I expect that you can find replacements. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:46, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.