Talk:Willingness to accept/Archives/2016
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Willingness to accept. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110720095243/http://www.ag.unr.edu/moeltner/APEC%20464_664/Spring_07/pdf/Horowitz_McConnell_2003.pdf to http://www.ag.unr.edu/moeltner/APEC%20464_664/Spring_07/pdf/Horowitz_McConnell_2003.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:24, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Dr. Drichoutis's comment on this article
Dr. Drichoutis has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
The section "Standard theory vs. experimental results" discusses only one side of the coin. For example, Plott and Zeiler (2005) offer a different interpretation than what has been frequently reported in the literature of the disparity between WTA and WTP measures by showing that "...observed gaps are symptomatic of subjects' misconceptions about the nature of the experimental task and that "the differences reported in the literature reflect differences in experimental controls for misconceptions as opposed to differences in the nature of the commodity.
References
Plott, Charles R. and Kathryn Zeiler. 2005. "The Willingness to Pay–Willingness to Accept Gap, the “Endowment Effect,” Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations." The American Economic Review, 95(3), 530-45.
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Drichoutis has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
- Reference : Drichoutis, Andreas C. & Vassilopoulos, Achilleas & Lusk, Jayson & Nayga, Rodolfo M., 2015. "Fair farming: Preferences for fair labor certification using four elicitation methods," MPRA Paper 62546, University Library of Munich, Germany.