Talk:Willis Gibson/GA1

Latest comment: 7 months ago by NegativeMP1 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: NegativeMP1 (talk · contribs) 17:45, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Soon. λ NegativeMP1 17:45, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Baseline

edit

None of the quickfail criteria applies to this article. For the subject matter, this seems to be very close to a GA in terms of length and broadness. No edit warring or cleanup banners that need immediate attention. No copyright violations appear to be present as well.

Prose

edit
  • Citations are not needed in the lead per WP:CITELEAD. This does bring up another issue however, that being that the "He is regarded as one of the best Tetris players in the United States" line is not included in the actual body. Either add it somewhere in the article or remove it entirely.
  Done Johnson524 05:52, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • "Gibson at 11 years old began to play the 1989 puzzle video game Tetris in 2021, after watching content relating to it on YouTube" → "Gibson began to play the 1989 puzzle video game Tetris in 2021, when he was 11 years old." Reads slightly better.
  Done Johnson524 05:52, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • The last line of the Background section can be put in the previous paragraph.
  Done Johnson524 05:52, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Is the quote box absolutely necessary?
I personally like it since that phrase in particular was used by the majority of media outlets to describe his reaction to the achievement, in my eyes making it notable, but I can remove it if you want. Johnson524 05:52, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit
  • Spotchecked references 2, 17, and 20. All verify the content they are cited to.

Images

edit
  • Please consider adding alt text to all of the images.
  Done Johnson524 05:52, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Final comments

edit

Overall a pretty good article, though there's some things that need to be addressed. I'll place this on hold to give you time. I might also take a second look when I'm done. λ NegativeMP1 18:39, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! I'll get to these corrections tonight 🙂 Johnson524 21:49, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
@NegativeMP1: Ok, we're all done! What do you think? Johnson524 05:52, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.