Talk:Willy Cahill

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --Bestinshow1917 (talk) 00:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

The most of the deleted material that had been published was approved by a previous editor on September 1st. I've added more info on Sept 7th and 13th. All the info has documentation back up, citation marks, references, etc. Please restore removed material.

@Bestinshow1917: Hello there. Between June 21st and September 15th, there has been copyrighted information in this article. These copyrighted materials were existing when the article was in draftspace and when the article was published mainspace. Here is a detailed explanation of what copyrighted information I've seen:

• 1) Draftspace: After some of the copyrighted material was removed on June 21st, there was still some remaining copyright on June 21st. This copyright came from a SF Gate source from 1995. Specifically, the four sentences from "During the past 30 years" to "He was offered the head coaching job". On July 2nd, your edit was copied from a 2013 Team USA article. When this article was accepted on September 7th, both copyright from Team USA and SFGate remained in the source. This can be seen with sentences like "Cahill has produced over 800 national and international medal winners" from SFGate and "His San Bruno dojo has consistently produced some of the nation’s most accomplished judoka" from Team USA.
• 2) Articlespace: After the article was published into mainspace, your edit on September 13th added additional copyrighted material. Some examples of copyrighted material added with this edit were from USJJF ("Willy built a new dojo in San Bruno and began a new era for Cahill's Judo Academy.") and SM Daily Journal ("both professors and founders of the American Judo and Jujitsu Federation".)

Overall, I believe an error was made with letting this article becoming published in September 7th as there was still copyrighted material in the draft. From June 21st to September 15th, there was copyrighted material in this article, whether it being old or new. As @CaptainEek: was the Wikipedian who accepted this AFC draft, I think their viewpoint on this would be helpful. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

MrLinkinPark333, It seemed that Diannaa had cleaned up the initial copyvio. When I accepted it, I believed I had made sure it was cleaned up, but I might have missed something. As you see, Bestinshow added more copyvio on September 12, which I reverted and rev-deleted. I then gave them another warning on-wiki about copyright. I have been rather busy IRL as of late though, and didn't see that they then added more copyvio material on the 13th. I did not knowingly approve any copyvio, and am very dissapointed to see Bestinshow continuing to add copyrighted material despite being warned on wiki, and having several people explain to them on IRC, in-depth, about copyright. I don't object to the article being deleted, though I haven't had time to examine the article to look for un-deleted copyvios. I also think that if the copyright problems continue, Bestinshow is heading quickly towards a block. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 03:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

CaptainEek Thank you for your explaination. No worries about missing copyright on this article. I know it was a mistake :) --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:03, 16 September 2020 (UTC)