Talk:Wind phone/GA1
Latest comment: 3 years ago by DanCherek in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Wasted Time R (talk · contribs) 00:19, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- I looked around a bit but didn't find anything to add to what's here.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- I was tempted to say the where visitors can hold one-way conversations with deceased loved ones in the lede should be reworded for clarity, but the by "talking" to him on the phone later makes that clear and I decided it's better the way it is.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- I scaled down the Ireland image because it was too big relative to the others.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- This is a really nice article. I almost always place GA nominations on hold, but with the few changes I made, I believe this meets the requirements and I am passing it right now.
- Pass/Fail:
@Wasted Time R: Your edits to the article are great. Thank you so much for the review! DanCherek (talk) 01:23, 17 April 2021 (UTC)