Talk:Windows 11, version 24H2

Microsoft Windows: Computing High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Microsoft Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Key Features section: first person, weird tone

Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I noticed that the Key Features section has weird non-neutral tone and uses first person language in a couple places. I can't find any sources for the exact language used, which makes me think it might be GenAI (or just written by someone with a confused idea of how wikipedia works).

I feel like it needs a rewrite to fix these issues. Yrfriendjkap (talk) 14:39, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

On further review, it appears to be a slight reword of (current) reference 12: [1] Yrfriendjkap (talk) 14:44, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic