 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
CYA?
editIs it really necessary to add "CYA" to the end of the article. It makes it look so much less professional, too bad I can't think of anything better to say.
Agreed. Reads better. Apologies to the author, but taken the liberty of removing that comment. an attempt at CYA.[citation needed] Ruairi lynch (talk) 17:01, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Blunder rather than Conspiracy
editMuch of the content here is supported in The American Century. Harold Evans. Jonathan Cape 1998 pp312-313 - more in connection with the concept that the attacks on Pearl Harbor were the result of widespread Roosevelt administration & Defence blunders rather than a conspiracy. Ruairi lynch (talk) 16:57, 22 August 2010 (UTC)