Talk:Winston Tunnel

Winston Tunnel was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 5, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
August 15, 2009	Good article reassessment	Kept
February 6, 2023	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

Illinois Mid‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 32, 2012

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Specs

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Those specs are crying out for an infobox... I'll try to find an appropriate one and move them there. —Rob (talk) 20:08, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

References

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm gonna fix these references to bring them into line with Wikipedia standards. Soon. Gws57 15:49, 24 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

NOT the longest railroad tunnel in Illinois

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Canadian National has a tunnel over one mile long on the former Illinois Central line known as the Edgewood Cutoff in southern Illinois. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.153.115.152 (talk) 23:35, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Winston Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060622002813/http://dnr.state.il.us:80/orep/nrrc/reporter/2005/July05.pdf to http://dnr.state.il.us/orep/nrrc/reporter/2005/July05.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:02, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

GAR

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Winston Tunnel

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: No improvements within the past week. Steelkamp (talk) 14:05, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Possible reassessment requested since March last year. The article contains some uncited text, and doesn't have an update after ~2006. Is DNR still "developing the area with nature trails and other improvements"? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 14:58, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Delist failing criterion 3. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:57, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic