Should this be an article about the aircraft the company or both? Do we need two articles?

edit

Someone already suggested to change the subject of the article from aircraft to the company which produces it. What do you think about it? --Leo067 (talk) 19:28, 12 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

There is already an article on the company Wisk Aero

The description of this aircraft as a gyrodyne is certainly not correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:87F0:9690:F976:150A:8C07:300C (talk) 15:38, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I disagree that the description as a gyrodyne is inaccurate. It may be unconventional, but it certainly meets the criteria as defined at the Gyrodyne article; it has a helicopter-like rotor system (people often forget that multicopters are a type of helicopter) for VTOL flight, as well as a propeller for forward thrust. That said, the cited source does not refer to the Cora as a gyrodyne, so its classification as one is original research. - ZLEA T\C 15:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply