Talk:Wissam al-Tawil
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wissam al-Tawil article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A news item involving Wissam al-Tawil was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 15 January 2024. |  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wrong Details
editWissam al-Tawil is confirmed NOT to be the brother-in-law of Nasrallah, as reported by Hezbullah-affiliated channels and accounts
There's also no confirmation of Wissam Al-Tawil being in the Rudwan Unit, since the pictures of him released showcased 2 patches: 1 officer corps patch, and 1 infantry brigade patch InfiniteValrath (talk) 18:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Word Choice
editAssassinated should be changed to killed. Assassinated puts a non-neutral spin on the story. 76.230.211.64 (talk) 18:58, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- This seems reasonable, so I have changed it. The English-language sources do not use the word "assassinate" or "assassination". I have not assessed the non-English ones, so someone else can chime in on those. ArcticSeeress (talk) 20:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)