Citations

edit

This page has a lot of facts that seem as though they should be readily verifiable. Does anyone have citations for them, or can anyone help to find citations? Seems like an easy page to get up to Wiki's standards.Brewspoker (talk) 16:38, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Wistar Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:37, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect Founder Information

edit

The Wistar Institute was founded by Isaac Wistar (Isaac J. Wistar), not Caspar. Isaac was a Civil War general, Caspar was his great-uncle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.91.62.86 (talk) 16:03, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

We need a citation for that; but in the meantime I've commented out the implausible and uncited early history. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:01, 7 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Working on removing promotional language

edit

Hi! I'm going to go over this article and filter out content with a non-neutral tone. Atomic putty? Rien! (talk) 13:37, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • Note: Language like "Educating and training the next generation of scientists are central to Wistar's mission. The Institute has developed several programs targeted to all levels of education" constitutes advertising language, because it is 1) not factually descriptive of the topic, i.e. not referring to a tangible feature of the topic which merits inclusion in an encyclopedia, AND 2) Full of buzzwords ripped from their website. Atomic putty? Rien! (talk) 13:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Miracle mice" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Miracle mice has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 5 § Miracle mice until a consensus is reached. jlwoodwa (talk) 19:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)Reply