Talk:Wizards & Warriors III: Kuros: Visions of Power/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 21:59, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   First off, there is a weirdly disconnected single-line paragraph in the lead that doesn't really need to be disconnected. The line of the reviewer saying it is his personal favourite is written in way that implies that it is in contrast to those who like it the best of the three games. Also, redirect Zippo Games to Rare. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 02:54, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

   I removed that one orphaned paragraph, as there was enough info in the lead anyways. As far as the redirect is concerned, I don't know if that would make sense. I mean, until the very end of the company's existence (when Rare eventually bought the company), Zippo Games was a completely separate company from Rare, and after it shut down, the Pickford brothers founded their own indie game company, Zee-3 (which is much of the development info comes from). –MuZemike 19:56, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   What makes HonestGamers a reliable source? - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 02:54, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

   Instead of arguing about it, I decided to remove the one sentence and replace that source with the much more reliable GamePro source. (diff: [1]) –MuZemike 19:56, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Second image uses a generic fair use rationale, while the first image is directly linked to the file instead of the site that uses it. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 02:54, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

   I strengthened the fair-use rationales for both images. –MuZemike 20:35, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Looks good. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 20:42, 20 May 2011 (UTC)