| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
my view
edityes, he is extremely homophobic and i dislike him alot because of this and because of many other reasons but to say that he's racist is completely nonsensical to me. he writes and talks about indigenous people with great respect and the polish word "dziki" which he sometimes uses is not an exact equivalent of "savage" (in the books section it is translated as "wild") so it's pointless to use it as an argument (sorry for my bad english). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.184.232.158 (talk) 12:18, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
and i'd like to add that in this interview (which was originaly used as a reference here, apparently to prove his racism) http://wiadomosci.dziennik.pl/opinie/artykuly/123961,wole-dzikusow-od-parady-gejow.html he says that "the indigenous people are my brothers and sisters with whom i am close". is this a statement of a racist guy? and you can find such statements in many of his writings. i understand that one my dislike or even despise him (as do i) but calling him racist is just extremely unjust and as far away from the truth as it is possible to be.
"views on homosexuality"
editIt does not contain any references to invectives Cejrowski alegedly has used (to be clear, I'm pretty sure he's said such things, but still references should be provided), unsubstantiated claims (by whose estimation is Cejrowski "Poland's most known" journalist opposing LGBT?), and it's inaccurate (it doesn't link to "his article", but to an interview with Cejrowski).
Of course his political stance is radical, but I can't understand why it's his views on homosexuality, of all issues in this world, that deserve a separate section, wedged between his bio and summary of his journalist activities : ) Why not abortion, drugs, atheism, taxes etc.?
I don't share his beliefs, but this is far from NPOV and the tone is not encyclopedic (like this is any surprise on Wikipedia...) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.168.110.42 (talk) 17:06, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
See also
editWith my all disrespect for both persons, what's the point of Janusz Korwin-Mikke in See also section? Krzysiu (talk) 10:09, 24 October 2017 (UTC)