Talk:WolfSSL

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Alexceltare2 in topic Addressing COI

Requested move 11 March 2015

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Claw of Slime (talk) 18:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)Reply



CyaSSLWolfSSL – Officially renamed since version 3.4.0.

Please move Template:Latest stable software release/CyaSSL to Template:Latest stable software release/wolfSSL at the same time. Claw of Slime (talk) 15:26, 11 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Moved as technical request.[1] --Claw of Slime (talk) 18:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WolfSSL. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:22, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Addressing COI

edit

After finding several overtly promotional insertions on pages related to industry standards and comparisons on behalf of this company and product, I have begun a review of the this page. I have already identified significant edits and substantial content here posted by editors working under usernames that match known employees of the company.

In addition, the existing notice that more independent sources and references are needed has been ignored. Of the current 15 footnoted reference links, 9 are links to the company website, 2 are broken links, and 3 are gratuitous links to standard licensing language of open source products in the same industry. Only 1 is a legitimate 3rd party reference.

I believe this page needs significant attention from independent editors to bring it up to Wikipedia standards. Seeing as most of the work on it has been from paid employees, that may pose an issue.

PedanticWithoutACause (talk) 00:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)Reply