Talk:Wolf children

Childrens fates

Kidnapping of Polish children by Nazi Germany for stylistic comparison.Xx236 (talk) 14:05, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

• Xx236, thank you for this information. It is now referred to in the article Wolf children under: See also.--Roland.h.bueb (talk) 16:07, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your interest but I meant mostly the propaganda language of this article in 2008 and more academic in the "Kidnapping of Polish children by Nazi Germany". Xx236 (talk) 07:44, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Evacuation

I don't know enough about the subject to edit the article, but the section "Evacuation impossible" does not fully agree with the evacuation plans (operation Hannibal) detailed in Evacuation_of_East_Prussia. At a minimum, I don't think it meets Wikipedia's stylistic standards. It should be updated, and at a minimum a link to the main evacuation article included. --209.139.197.120 (talk) 21:43, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

• As source for the forbidden evacuation between end 1944 and January 1945 I added to the article: (de) Ruth Leiserowitz: Von Ostpreußen nach Kyritz. Wolfskinder auf dem Weg nach Brandenburg. (title translated: From East Prussia to Kyritz. Wolf children on their way to Brandenburg.) Brandenburgische Zentrale für politische Bildung, Potsdam 2003, ISBN 3-932502-33-7, p. 9 --Roland.h.bueb (talk) 17:00, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Translation from German to the English language

I will start to translate some parts from de:Wolfskind (Zweiter Weltkrieg) from German to English language.--Roland.h.bueb (talk) 16:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC)--Roland.h.bueb (talk) 16:16, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

• Today I finished translation of missing parts from German de:Wolfskind (Zweiter Weltkrieg) to English language.--Roland.h.bueb (talk) 20:41, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Probably not a reliable source

Preußische Allgemeine Zeitung. [1] etc. Volunteer Marek 07:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Communist Party line in Russia and Poland

Russia means probably the SU. Why Poland is mentioned here? Poland generally wasn't allowed to criticize the SU, eg. the tragic fate of Polish children. Xx236 (talk) 08:31, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wolf children. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130810154920/http://wissen.spiegel.de/wissen/image/show.html?did=9463957&aref=image017%2FSP1996%2F003%2FSP199600300620068.pdf&thumb=false to http://wissen.spiegel.de/wissen/image/show.html?did=9463957&aref=image017%2FSP1996%2F003%2FSP199600300620068.pdf&thumb=false

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:47, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Source 3 is bias and not at all reliable

Hello all. I was reading this article and the section which clarifies the bad fate of many of the children " Thousands more were abandoned, orphaned, raped or kidnapped.[3]" is a terribly bias source. Don't get me wrong I do believe that this fate did meet a fair few of the children but the source being used for it is most definitely not reliable.

If you view the website that was linked you can see that the article does not provide any evidence or sources to back up its claims and is clearly the creation of the website owner. This becomes an immediate problem when you read the clear bias and apologism of the article in question, especially when you read the final two paragraphs that go into great lengths to paint the picture of how the Allied Countries were all bloodthirsty while Prussia was a pure harmless utopia. The bias and un-sourced claims are really not suitable. --82.20.70.163 (talk) 11:08, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

 Done The cited source was clearly not reliable. Not only was it a personal blog (unreliable in itself), some pages there were quite bizarre. Alsee (talk) 22:21, 22 October 2018 (UTC)