Talk:Wolf in the Snow

Wolf in the Snow has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 31, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Children's literature Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

GA Review

Latest comment: 6 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Wolf in the Snow/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nova Crystallis (talk · contribs) 05:28, 27 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reviewing later. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 05:28, 27 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Most plots have a lot more detail, from the beginning to the end. This is more of a synopsis of a movie that hasn't come out yet.

It's a wordless picture book so it's not going to be too long but more can definitely be added. Want to get my hands back on the book before making this change. Best, Barkeep49 (talk)

Done

The lead has to be longer than just two sentences, as it does not summarize the whole article yet.

The lead was three sentences but I get your point :). Each paragraph is now represented by a sentence in the LEAD.

You should go into detail for some of the reviews, especially from major newspapers.

Added some quotes. Thoughts? Best, Barkeep49 (talk)

Last reference does not have the same format as the others.

Fixed? I know this is super important at FA but have always been glad it's more relaxed at GA. I know it to be something I'm not necessarily great with. Best, Barkeep49 (talk)

Should be it for now. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 07:01, 28 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Nova Crystallis: I believe I have addressed your comments. Let me know what you think. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 14:35, 30 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

One more thing. I think you should rename your criticism section to "Reception and awards," criticism has a negative connotation. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 22:54, 30 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Done - Thanks for the reminder of the MOS suggested heading title. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Passing. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 04:03, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic