Talk:Wolstanton

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Photo

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The text in the article included a request for a photo of the colliery winding towers. I have removed this to make the article flow better and also because such requests should be here. Anyone? The joy of all things (talk) 14:27, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wolstanton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131113195619/http://www.strath.ac.uk/media/ps/comms/itallstartedhere/Faulds.pdf to http://www.strath.ac.uk/media/ps/comms/itallstartedhere/Faulds.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:09, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Recent developments section needs updating

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As it is now 8 years since the local Marks and Spencer store was given planning permission it would be useful if (especially a local user) could let us know if it is now built and if it could still be the largest in UK in the absence of a larger one being built in the meantime elsewhere by the company.Cloptonson (talk) 10:59, 27 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic