Talk:Woman on top
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Crossroads in topic RfC: Amazon position spinoff
 | Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
|
|
Tagged as { { globalize } }
editSee my recent comments at Talk:Missionary position. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 03:47, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- As I said there: per the template's help page,
This tag should only be applied to articles where global perspectives are reasonably believed to exist (e.g., that people in China have a different view about an idea or situation than people in Germany or South Africa).
. Without evidence of that, the tag is not needed. What evidence is there that people in these places view this topic differently? Crossroads -talk- 18:58, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
RfC: Amazon position spinoff
editAmazon position currently redirects here and casually mentioned once. However, the topic has been covered in numerous reliable sources, and it is an important woman on top position. I believe there is opportunity to expand on the topic in this page, and also change the redirect page into an actual spinoff page. Sir Kenneth Kho (talk) 17:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- This article isn't that long (a bit overloaded with pictures, but we can fix that) and I can't imagine an amazon position article would be that long either. Seems to make more sense to include it here. Crossroads -talk- 00:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)