Talk:Women's Royal Australian Naval Service
A fact from Women's Royal Australian Naval Service appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 March 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Daily page views
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Citation needed tags
editAs part of an update to the article, there are now a number if {{citation needed}} tags. Much (if not all) of this content may come from A History of HMAS Harman and its people: 1943–1993 by Annette Nelson; this work was listed in a general Reference section before I moved it to "Further Reading". I don't have access to this book, but if anyone does, checking the uncited statements against it and putting footnotes in where possible would be greatly appreciated. -- saberwyn 07:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Women's Royal Australian Naval Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120227141238/http://www.navy.gov.au/w/images/PIAMA35.pdf to http://www.navy.gov.au/w/images/PIAMA35.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 21 January 2018 (UTC)