Talk:Women's Twenty20

Requested move 30 June 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 10:00, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

---

Women's Twenty20 cricket → Women's Twenty20 – Minor, but to keep it consistent with other cricket format pages without the word "cricket" (unless necessary), i.e. Twenty20 and Women's Twenty20 International. Seems like it was originally at Women's Twenty20 but got moved for reasons I can't quite work out from edit histories. Mpk662 (talk) 09:46, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

• Support per nom. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 13:39, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
• Support for consistency with other T20 articles. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:18, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
• Support per nom and other comments. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 08:55, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
• Support Actually, the word "Test cricket" is used so that general readers can distinguish it from the other uses of "Test". But when you are saying " Women's Twenty20" then anybody will easily understand that it is being referred to a format of cricket. And MPK, you could simply get the redirect deleted by inserting "db-g6" template on the page, as it would have been an uncontroversial page move.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.