Talk:Women's World Chess Championship 2018 (November)
Latest comment: 5 years ago by J. Sketter in topic Flags on the brackets without anything else in that box
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Change title
editShouldn't the title be so that the "(tournament)" part is removed? The 2017 article and the ones before it doesn't have it so it should be consistent.Airgum (talk) 16:45, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- There was another world championship, so it is needed i guess. But i've redirected Women's World Chess Championship 2018 to here now. -Koppapa (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- In my opinion the articles should be Women's World Chess Championship 2018 (May) and Women's World Chess Championship 2018 (November). The current article titles give the impression of two different world titles, a "match title" and a "tournament title". Adpete (talk) 08:14, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
- I agree with Adpete. That sounds better naming. --J. Sketter (talk) 15:32, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
- In my opinion the articles should be Women's World Chess Championship 2018 (May) and Women's World Chess Championship 2018 (November). The current article titles give the impression of two different world titles, a "match title" and a "tournament title". Adpete (talk) 08:14, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Flags on the brackets without anything else in that box
editIt seems that some people disapprove of the technique above. Whoever started this ssection agrees with this, simply because one would then know the country of the person filling that spot in the next few days or even quicker.211.27.126.189 (talk) 19:59, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
- Doesn't really matter much. -Koppapa (talk) 07:30, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- Don't some people oppose aga211.27.126.189 (talk) 20:34, 11 November 2018 (UTC)inst this?
- I honestly fail to fully understand the question. But if it is about if it's suitable to declare the winner a chinese when both of the finalists are chinese, I see it as a bad working habit. Draft-like editorial content should stay invisible till we have something substantial information to offer. There's no hurry and readers are not stupid. --J. Sketter (talk) 19:16, 9 December 2018 (UTC)