Talk:Women's championships in WWE
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
broad-concept article
editThis dab page was created after it was proposed by several people at Talk:WWE Women's Championship (1956–2010)#Requested move 16 September 2016. I do not think a broad concept article would work, everything is already covered in WWE Diva and Professional wrestling championship#Gender championships.LM2000 (talk) 13:00, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Per WP:DABCONCEPT, a disambiguation page is for ambiguously titled unrelated concepts, like mercury, the element, and Mercury, the planet, or battery, the device, and battery, the criminal act. If it is possible to describe a relationship between the terms included on the page, then they are not ambiguous. Rather, they are variations of the broad concept, and the reader is better served by an explanation of this relationship. Perhaps what would work best here is a set index article, with a table comparing categories of information. bd2412 T 13:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Some expansion into an SIA may be appropriate. But there really isn't a single primary topic among the disambiguation links here. All 4 of the listed titles are to some extent equivalent, just representing different periods in company history. None are fully primary over the other, and if anything is the main topic, it's the two articles LM2000 mentioned. Though the WWE Diva one should probably be renamed, as the term wasn't first used until the late attitude era (c 2000 or so) and was dropped like a rock last year, meaning it is only appropriate for maybe 15 years out of a 50 year company history. A more general title like "Women in WWE" is more appropriate. oknazevad (talk) 13:22, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Perhaps "Women's titles in the WWE". 13:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- We sort of have that with WWE Diva#Championships and accomplishments.LM2000 (talk) 13:43, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- There's no prohibition against a little duplication of material if the distinct presentations serve different purposes. bd2412 T 14:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- But is anybody going to search for that title? Descriptive titles are fine, but an implausible search term for a SIA defeats the purpose. oknazevad (talk) 16:28, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- If this title redirects there, and other plausible titles redirect there, then search terms are a diminished concern. bd2412 T 17:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- But is anybody going to search for that title? Descriptive titles are fine, but an implausible search term for a SIA defeats the purpose. oknazevad (talk) 16:28, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- There's no prohibition against a little duplication of material if the distinct presentations serve different purposes. bd2412 T 14:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- We sort of have that with WWE Diva#Championships and accomplishments.LM2000 (talk) 13:43, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Perhaps "Women's titles in the WWE". 13:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Some expansion into an SIA may be appropriate. But there really isn't a single primary topic among the disambiguation links here. All 4 of the listed titles are to some extent equivalent, just representing different periods in company history. None are fully primary over the other, and if anything is the main topic, it's the two articles LM2000 mentioned. Though the WWE Diva one should probably be renamed, as the term wasn't first used until the late attitude era (c 2000 or so) and was dropped like a rock last year, meaning it is only appropriate for maybe 15 years out of a 50 year company history. A more general title like "Women in WWE" is more appropriate. oknazevad (talk) 13:22, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Lede
editIntro says WWE "has maintained at least one primary women's championship since 1956". That's not really true, is it? They didn't own Moolah's belt till the 80s, before that they may have recognized her as NWA Women's champion but that's not quite the same as actually maintaining her championship.LM2000 (talk) 07:36, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- Its a pretty meaningless statement overall since they have breaks twice in 90s also. - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 13:17, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Alexa Bliss
editAlexa Bliss was the longest reigning Raw Women's Champion at 223 days from August 28, 2017 to April 8, 2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheUltamateBoss3900 (talk • contribs) 01:56, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Include or not
editShould the women's tag team championships be included in here? What about the two FCW women's championships? - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 14:10, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 16 January 2024
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Becky Lynch 156.34.175.2 (talk) 16:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC) Under the section "Most combined days as champion" In Becky Lynch's Section
Change: NXT Women's Championship (1 time, current)
To: NXT Women's Championship (1 time)
As Becky Lynch is no longer the NXT Women's Champion https://www.wwe.com/titlehistory/nxt-womens-championship — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.175.2 (talk) 16:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Already done. The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1(The Garage) 17:35, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
