Talk:Won't You Pimai Neighbor?
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notability
editAs regards the notability question posted on this page, I know that this episode of King of the Hill has been featured in a Buddhist film festival and short conference at UC Berkeley regarding depictions of Buddhism in the media. I'll try and track down a concrete ref. --Clay Collier 12:42, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Pimai Neighbor.JPG
edit
Image:Pimai Neighbor.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Why does this page exist?
editWhy does this article even exist? Out of all the 259 King of the Hill episodes, why does this episode and a few others in particular get their own article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.163.81.242 (talk) 00:07, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Because it has sourced information about its reception? Dimadick (talk) 07:47, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- I still don't think it should, regardless. 71.163.81.242 (talk) 22:32, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Laotian New Year isn't Lunar
editIt's Lunisolar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.171.240.50 (talk) 17:48, 26 March 2018 (UTC)