Talk:Woodburn Premium Outlets

This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Shopping Centers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Recent edits

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I have reverted the edits by User:She Who Photographs as I feel that they are not notable for inclusion in the article. Her insertion of POV text to Image:Woodburn Company Stores.jpg copied from a Yahoo Group makes me believe that she is using the article as a soapbox. As for the items deleted:

a shop lifting ring of that size is nothing extraordinary
a mall opening early on Black Friday is typical
the casual sex story is not notable within the casual sex scene
the failure of a bus line is not notable as it is not the first mall bus line nor particularly innovative

Please feel free to discuss the removal. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree with the removal of these non-notable facts. They should certainly be discussed here before being added again. --John (talk) 05:50, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I boldly removed the shoplifting ring and Mall opening/attendance information. A bunch of people went to a mall. Some people stole things. This isn't encyclopedic... this is simply life. If consensus is to restore for some reason, the ridiculous lead ins need to be trimmed from the refs. Beyond being ugly and redundant with the articles, they are a copyright violation.--Isotope23 ^talk 13:46, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic