Talk:Woodland Trust
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Ancient Tree Hunt (UK) page were merged into Woodland Trust on 2014-03-12. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Tree Council
editI've removed the text about the Tree Council added by Kid Dynamo which was apparently copied from this web site: Trees for Cities, but added back the external link. The text appears to be copyright, but in any case it belongs in an article about the Tree Council, not the current page. Charivari 03:34, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Woodland-trust-logo2.gif
editImage:Woodland-trust-logo2.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Merge discussion
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Selective merge done as per User:Zangar. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:21, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
The Ancient Tree Hunt (UK) discusses a campaign by the Woodland Trust, but I don't the campaign is notable enough to stand on it's own, and the information would fit well in this article. I'd suggest dropping things like the Database Search and Interactive Map sections. Any thoughts? Worm 12:29, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support - on the grounds of notability and the fact that once you strip out the sections that are essentially manuals there's not enough left to warrant this split. As this has been suggested for a while now, perhaps we should be bold and go ahead with the merge if there are no opposes. Cheers, Zangar (talk) 22:31, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Woodland Trust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150208070903/http://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/en/jubilee-woods/about/Pages/our-flagship-wood.aspx to http://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/en/jubilee-woods/about/Pages/our-flagship-wood.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:56, 29 August 2015 (UTC)