Talk:Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The author of this article, joe, has declared that the text is in the public domain. He provided this e-mail exchange:
Dear Joe, Thank you for your inquiry. This is to advise you that the 1992-93 WEDI Report is available on the WEDI Website at www.wedi.org and is in the public domaine for your reference and use. We would ask that you cite WEDI as a source for the document or any excerpts that you might care to utilize. Please feel free to contact me with any additional questions. Jim Schuping EVP/CEO WEDI 703-391-2716
the name is not correct
editthis organization goes by the name WEDI.
I do not have a problem with the original heading "WEDI Workgoup for Electronic Data Interchange.
Peple searching for this site will use the term = WEDI.
There is another site called WEDI standing for the call letter of a radio station.
I will need to disambiguate that site, so that the WEDI listing makes sense for users of wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Josephbrophy (talk • contribs)
- The radio station article is now called WEDI (radio station), and WEDI has been changed to a disambiguation page already pointing to both this article and the radio station, plus two more similarly-titled articles in the "See also" section.
- So people searching for "WEDI" can now find both articles easily. Note that the radio station article has 16 other articles linking directly to it, plus a radio station template transcluding to hundreds more, after I updated their links from WEDI to WEDI (radio station).
- No further disambiguation will be required. Thanks, Clicketyclack 20:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- The title of this article must be Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange. This allows casual users to search for "Workgroup for Data Interchange", in example, and find the article anyways. -- ReyBrujo 03:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Joe, concerning your message, I have to agree with the above opinions. —Anas talk? 14:27, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Editing this Site
editI plan to edit this work to meet the high standards of Wikipedia. I will add a lot of links to help reduce the amount of material, and also to add other relevant material.
I have lost of lot of time in my effort to do this because my original attempt for DELETED.
References
editi have a number of references and other important material to include with this article. right now i am a bit bogged down. joe 02:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)joe
i CAN'T BELIEVE IT H AS BEEN FIVE YEARS SINCE I WORKED ON THIS ARTICLE; I WILL TRY TO IMPROVE ITjoe (talk) 02:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)JOE