Talk:Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Josephbrophy in topic References

The author of this article, joe, has declared that the text is in the public domain. He provided this e-mail exchange:

  Dear Joe,

  Thank you for your inquiry.  This is to advise you that the 1992-93 WEDI Report is 
  available on the WEDI Website at www.wedi.org and is in the public domaine for your 
  reference and use.  We would ask that you cite WEDI as a source for the document or 
  any excerpts that you might care to utilize.  Please feel free to contact me with 
  any additional questions.

  Jim Schuping
  EVP/CEO
  WEDI
  703-391-2716

Anas talk? 11:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

the name is not correct

edit

this organization goes by the name WEDI.

I do not have a problem with the original heading "WEDI Workgoup for Electronic Data Interchange.

Peple searching for this site will use the term = WEDI.

There is another site called WEDI standing for the call letter of a radio station.

I will need to disambiguate that site, so that the WEDI listing makes sense for users of wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Josephbrophy (talkcontribs)

The radio station article is now called WEDI (radio station), and WEDI has been changed to a disambiguation page already pointing to both this article and the radio station, plus two more similarly-titled articles in the "See also" section.
So people searching for "WEDI" can now find both articles easily. Note that the radio station article has 16 other articles linking directly to it, plus a radio station template transcluding to hundreds more, after I updated their links from WEDI to WEDI (radio station).
No further disambiguation will be required. Thanks, Clicketyclack 20:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
The title of this article must be Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange. This allows casual users to search for "Workgroup for Data Interchange", in example, and find the article anyways. -- ReyBrujo 03:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Joe, concerning your message, I have to agree with the above opinions. —Anas talk? 14:27, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Editing this Site

edit

I plan to edit this work to meet the high standards of Wikipedia. I will add a lot of links to help reduce the amount of material, and also to add other relevant material.

I have lost of lot of time in my effort to do this because my original attempt for DELETED.

joejoe 02:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

i have a number of references and other important material to include with this article. right now i am a bit bogged down. joe 02:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)joeReply

i CAN'T BELIEVE IT H AS BEEN FIVE YEARS SINCE I WORKED ON THIS ARTICLE; I WILL TRY TO IMPROVE ITjoe (talk) 02:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)JOEReply