Talk:Works council
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | The contents of the Jugend- und Auszubildendenvertretung page were merged into Works council on 2021-07-09. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Italianfaucets.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Invalid link
editPage link is invalid for "European Commission: European Works Council legislation"
Need to replace link: http://europa.eu/scadplus/leg/en/cha/c10805.htm with updated link: http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/employment_and_social_policy/social_dialogue/c10805_en.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.34.223.1 (talk • contribs) 2011-04-14 (UTC)
General introduction
editI find the general introduction highly missleading and not stating the actual facts. The subsection Germany lists the facts, but the toplevel info brings up some side-aspects which are presented one-sided. Betriebsräte are a way for employee empowerment, not an "extended arm" of a union. The law clearly separated what each organisation is able to rule or bargain! No national agreement is changed by a local Betriebsrat, there you need to have a local agreement with a union ("Haustarifvertrag").
Also the "three main views" are not even referenced. And to my understanding they are written in a way to disgrace the Betriebsrat. This is not wiki-style
-> Please review and correct these factual wrong explanations.
62.96.12.26 (talk) 12:44, 19 October 2021 (UTC) 62.96.12.26 (talk) 12:44, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Only positive?
editThe section on Germany makes it sound like there are zero downsides and everything is perfect. Seems a bit unrealistic and sounds like marketing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:646:8F00:3DF:6495:982B:E83D:A5E5 (talk) 19:07, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Libertarian?
editWhy is this article shown as being part of the series on libertarianism? The series doesn't mention it and the article never draws a connection to libertarianism either (and it strikes me as more social democratic, although I'm hardly an expert). 50.232.161.120 (talk) 02:41, 26 April 2024 (UTC)