Talk:World history (field)/Archives/2018
 | This is an archive of past discussions about World history (field). Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on World history. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080512153957/http://www.historycooperative.org/jwhindex.html to http://www.historycooperative.org/jwhindex.html
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://marx.org/archive/marx/works/1875/gotha/index.htm - Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://marx.org/archive/marx/works/1871/civil-war-france/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Article apart for Transnational history
Mentioning transnational history in the introduction is absolutely fair as global, world, and transnational history share a lot in common. Meanwhile, having studied transnational history and currently using this approach for my PhD, I believe that it could have its own article. Ideas of border crossing, entangled analysis, circulation of knowledge occur at a smaller level than global history and could therefore be explained in an article called 'Transnational history'. What do you think? --Jordan Girardin (talk) 12:10, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Definitions are pretty hard. As you say, a lot (probably most) of what calls itself "modern world history" could equally fit under transnational history. Transnational history covers both German/French interactions and French/Chinese interactions, but only the latter would likely be considered world history as well. I'm kind of amazed that we have no article for histoire croisée/entanglement. If you're going to put in the effort, I'd personally rather see a good article on that topic than another broad article like this one, but it's up to you. de:Histoire_croisée exists on German wikipedia.- TheMightyQuill (talk) 17:18, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. Entangled history was going to be my next target. Perhaps I should start with that, and if articles get developed enough we can finish this historiographical triangle with 'transnational history'. -- Jordan Girardin (talk) 13:00, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- You'd be doing a great service if you write that article! Good luck. - TheMightyQuill (talk) 00:51, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- I realise this is several years after the discussion above, but I would echo the concern: transnational history is not "world history", although they do have some points of similarity, and should have its own article. It's very possible to write a transnational history of a small area and, conventionally, the term "transnational" is usually applied to this sort of study (of Europe, for example). There also seems to be a growing consensus that Global and World history are different, although these could certainly be discussed in a single article. —Brigade Piron (talk) 08:58, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- I agree with Jordan Girardin and Brigade Piron. There certainly should be a seperate article "transnational history." There are articles on transnational history on the Danish, German, and the Luxembourgish Wikipedias. (talk) 13:10, 2 March 2017 (CET)
- I realise this is several years after the discussion above, but I would echo the concern: transnational history is not "world history", although they do have some points of similarity, and should have its own article. It's very possible to write a transnational history of a small area and, conventionally, the term "transnational" is usually applied to this sort of study (of Europe, for example). There also seems to be a growing consensus that Global and World history are different, although these could certainly be discussed in a single article. —Brigade Piron (talk) 08:58, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- You'd be doing a great service if you write that article! Good luck. - TheMightyQuill (talk) 00:51, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. Entangled history was going to be my next target. Perhaps I should start with that, and if articles get developed enough we can finish this historiographical triangle with 'transnational history'. -- Jordan Girardin (talk) 13:00, 11 November 2013 (UTC)