Talk:WrestleMania XI/GA1
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Mattisse in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I may as well review this article, as now I know the story! Looking through it now it looks fine. I will review it more closely and add comments. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:29, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- Tim White needs disambiguation.
This is all I can find. I did a little copy editing. The article looks very good. —Mattisse (Talk) 02:03, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
I fixed the wikilink. Thanks for pointing it out. I should have realized that it was a common name. GaryColemanFan (talk) 02:08, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Final GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): It is well written b (MoS):No obvious MoS error detected
- a (prose): It is well written b (MoS):No obvious MoS error detected
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): Article is appropriately referenced b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): The references appear reliable
- a (references): Article is appropriately referenced b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): The references appear reliable
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): Covers the entire event b (focused): Remains focused on topic
- a (major aspects): Covers the entire event b (focused): Remains focused on topic
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:Is neutral
- Fair representation without bias:Is neutral
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Good job on this article, once again. —Mattisse (Talk) 02:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)