Talk:X-Force

Move content to separate articles

I really feel that most of the information on the second X-Force/X-Statix should be moved to X-Statix, with only a short paragraph in this article and a link. The same should be done for X-Cutioner's Song. Notice that I cut out a lot of the Cable background, as well as other characters: that information should go in the respective character articles, as Cable (comics) already does. -leigh (φθόγγος) 08:43, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)

Also, will this article lead with "X-Force is/was a series" or "X-Force is/was a team"? The distinction is important, because it colors the rest of the article. Personally, I vote for the latter. That mentality allows us to do the "Introduction / Publication history / Fictional biography" structure that has worked so well in articles like Wolverine (comics) and The Flash. Actually, this latter question should really be discussed on Wikipedia talk: WikiProject Comics, to develop a consistent universal policy, so I'll copy this paragraph there.-leigh (φθόγγος) 08:43, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)

Moving all X-Statix related stuff to an X-Statix page is fine with me and moving the Cable bits was a fine decision. I am also not overly concerned with either series or team so do as you wish. - User:Rorschach567

All images by Liefeld

Every single image on this page was drawn by Rob Liefeld. I find this incredibly depressing. -leigh (φθόγγος) 10:03, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:XFORCE 1.jpg

Image:XFORCE 1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:21, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Xforce40.jpg

Image:Xforce40.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 08:09, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

C-Class rated for Comics Project

As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 14:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Wolfsbane

I thought Wolfsbane became associated with the team because they were trying to assist her after she was brainwashed. Lots42 (talk) 07:33, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Kosch

Who is this Kosch character who was supposedly a member of X-Force in the vol. 2 miniseries? I remember Liefeld introducing some pretty forgettable characters in the mini, but I don't remember any of them actually JOINING the team. Does anybody have any further info on this character? Thanks! DeadpoolRP (talk) 21:38, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Anybody know? Is Kosch a real character? Should I delete him? DeadpoolRP (talk) 04:15, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Movie? I've fallen for that one before.

The Deadpool article says "According to Rob Liefeld, Deadpool will appear in the X-Force movie" and gives this citation from IGN (December 2013). The imminent/stalled/imminent/indefinitely-stalled/nearly-greenlit nature of the oft-rumored Deadpool aolo movie makes me a bit skeptical of the notion that an X-Force movie will make it to the big screen.

Even though the news apparently comes right from Liefeld, the possibility should only be considered rumor at present if it is to be mentioned at all in this article. It could be that Liefeld is intentionally overstating the status of the project in order to generate more buzz around it. Even so, it does make sense that Fox would be looking for ways to turn their Marvel properties into a cinematic phenomenon like Disney/Marvel's Avengers franchise. Starling2001 (talk) 20:32, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on X-Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071027110315/http://www.cbgxtra.com:80/Default.aspx?tabid=695 to http://www.cbgxtra.com/Default.aspx?tabid=695

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:28, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on X-Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060118100514/http://users.rcn.com:80/aardy/comics/awards/cbg.shtml to http://users.rcn.com/aardy/comics/awards/cbg.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)