Talk:X11 color names

Duplicated colors

Some of these are the same color but the names are not. Whose problem is this?? 66.245.78.149 20:23, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I've just checked the rgb.txt file on my PC (running XOrg 6.7.0) and it's that way in the original file. (The original file is in numerical order of colour triplets, so it's really obvious.) I'll add a note to the article - David Gerard 12:21, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Visibility?

Some of the colour names are also links to wiki nodes. Names for some of the darker colours are difficult to read, because wiki links are coloured blue. Blue on darkness == bad visibility.

Any idea what could be done to remedy this? What if we duplicate the name, first as plain text and second as a wiki link?

Tricky one ... they may be blue but aren't necessarily - David Gerard 16:41, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

To me, the obvious solution is to separate the text from the displayed colors, like this:

Name	= Color	Hex	= Color	RGB	= Color
AliceBlue		#F0F8FF		240, 248, 255
AntiqueWhite		#FAEBD7		250, 235, 215
Aqua		#00FFFF		0, 255, 255
Aquamarine		#7FFFD4		127, 255, 212
...		...		...

That way it doesn't matter which colors get linked. - dcljr 06:55, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Indigo? and Other Added Colors

The copies of rgb.txt I have access to (XFree86 4.3.0, Xorg 6.8.1, the X server shipped with Solaris) don't contain an entry for indigo. What is the source of the indigo entry?

Same for copies of rgb.txt I have access to: Xorg 6.8.2, XFree86 4.2.1, XFree86 4.1.0, and also Emacs 21.4 and 21.2 (for Cygwin). http://vancouver-webpages.com/DIY/color.html mentions that Netscape and WebTV, but not rgb.txt, have indigo; but that's all the info I could find online about it (other than pages including it in a list of X11 color names). --Mairi 06:29, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

Comparing this list to my actual rgb.txt ($Xorg: rgb.txt,v 1.3 2000/08/17 19:54:00 cpqbld Exp $), these eight colors are in the wikipedia article but not in the file: aqua, crimson, fuchsia, indigo, lime, olive, silver, and teal. Furthermore, some colors listed in rgb.txt aren't listed in the article, not including the numbered colors (ie "gray99"). Also, the list doesn't stay consistent with its naming of the grays, while rgb.txt lists both the American English spelling (gray) and the British English spelling (grey) every time that name is used. Clearly, the list presented in the article isn't from an actual copy of rgb.txt. --Jaybeeunix 02:17, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

This authorative page [1] lists 140, the WP article has seven more, all of which are gray/grey variants. I am therefore removing the disputed tag, which in any case should have been inserted in the article only after failure to reach a concensus here. Viajero | Talk 17:49, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

[2] is not an authoritative page for this article. As the article states, that is “a list of the X11 colors [X11COLORS] supported by popular browsers” (my emphasis added). Thus, that page only purports to be a subset of the X11 colors. The subset nature is more obvious if one follows the link to which the w3c page refers to as the authority of that list. --Jaybeeunix 17:07, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Gamma Correction

Are these gamma corrected? Do they assume they will be displayed on a standard 2.5 gamma CRT or LCD? Otherwise, the values need to go through gamma correction to see the real result (see http://xona.com/colorlist for an example of how FAR off the mark colors can be without proper gamma correction). Also, you can't assume the browser programmers to have thought of this. The standard 6x6x6 = 216 colors 'web safe colors' are an example of where they just don't 'get' gamma correction: Web_colors.137.186.22.189 20:44, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

Since this article is about X11 I think it should be noted that the individual X servers (basically the display) have an option to specify one’s gamma correction for his/her hardware. For example, see the -gamma, -rgamma, -ggamma, and -bgamma options in XFree86-like servers. --Jaybeeunix 18:44, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

If the orginal list was given in sRGB and the user has calibrated his monitor properly, then using the original RGB values should yield the result we want. Shinobu 03:12, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

I belive list is just list of RGB triples, thus it assumes sRGB. However, before performing real manipulations (like combining multiple colors, doing gradients, introducing alpha channel, or making color darker/brighter) one should convert to linear space for correct math operations. I do not know what CSS spec says about this. --91.213.255.7 (talk) 20:16, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

The original X11 colors were based on whatever gamma correction and primary colors were provided on the particular workstation. These varied dramatically from one machine to another. CSS colors are now specified to be sRGB. -jacobolus (t) 22:51, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Table simplification

I've made the following changes to the table:

1. Removed background color from all text cells so everyone can read the text, regardless of gamma/monitor settings, etc.; only Sample column now shows the colors.
2. Used hex to specify color in "style" attribute (figured this would be the most widely supported, although any browser that knows "style" should be able to handle all three ways of specifying color — another reason I removed color from the other 2 columns). If you know that some browsers/OSs will show different colors depending on how they are specified (name/hex/rgb), please discuss here.
3. Removed a lot of the formatting (font size, text alignment); made color-name cells regular cells rather than header cells; changed "monospace" style to <tt> tags (better browser support, I assume).
4. Linked "Hex" and "RGB" in header (oh, and removed "#" from hex values in that column).

I hope there aren't any major objections; this article has just bugged me for a long time, so I decided to finally do something about it. - dcljr (talk) 00:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

I changed the table format to match List of colors. I think the table looks much nicer with RGB values in seperate columns. However, I also reintroduced bold names, #-prefixes, and some right-aligned text. I did this mostly for consistency, rather than personal preference. If you strongly disagree with these changes, the #-prefixes and bold names are easily removed with find-and-replace. But please consider keeping the RGB values right-aligned. They're prettier that way. —Ryanrs 13:03, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Not sure why that would be, but whatever. That's fine. Still looks a lot better than before my last edit. - dcljr (talk) 06:39, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Wonderful work all the way around, but the list was more useful to me when the groupings were by color; e.g., I want to look through the reds, or the greens, or whatever. The Turkish translation still has this arrangement, and I hope it gets kept. For the English language, I think it's fine to leave what's here as-is, and add another table that's grouped by appearance. Marc W. Abel 22:25, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

I completely agree - wonderful work on the simplified table format - thanks dclrj! Marc - maybe the table grouping by color could be made into it's own page. I would also find that useful. Then you could link that article to this page. --Unixguy 11:37, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Marc - for the table grouped by color, see the Web Colors article. --Unixguy

I would recommend moving hex into a single column: the only reason to have hex there is for copy/paste into contexts where a hex designation is needed; otherwise it’s completely redundant with the decimal representation. Hex should either be scrapped as redundant, or else it should be put into one column where it can be usefully copy/pasted. –jacobolus (t) 23:11, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Khaki

According to Khaki_(color)#Web_color_light_khaki, web kaki is #C3B091 and X11 khaki is #F0E68C. Quote>

This is the color called khaki in X11. This is one of the cases where the X11 color names differs from the HTML/CSS names.

--burga (talk) 21:13, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

That article was wrong, I corrected it. — Christoph Päper 17:27, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

HTML Gray and others are mistaken

Shouldn't the hex (and by extension the numeric value) of gray be listed as 0x808080 for the HTML comparison? Same goes for green, etc. 7F should be 80, right?--61.194.119.130 (talk) 05:30, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

table gone out of control

Hi Crissov. I’m pretty unconvinced that the color names table here needs 21 columns, the first 9 of which are basically 3 numbers redundantly repeated 3 times each. Almost no readers of this article are going to care about most of the subsequent columns, either. I would suggest instead using columns:

• "8-bit hex" (here meaning 8-bit per component). This is the 6-hex-digit code which will produce the color in HTML or similar. This column need not be broken into 3 parts or sortable, since the ordering is redundantly stored in the next columns.

• R, G, and B components, as 3-digit decimals, on the range [0, 1]. These are much more intuitively obvious than integers in the range [0, 255], and more precise than integer percentages in the range [0, 100]. The decimal point makes it immediately clear what the number represents, so readers need not scroll up to the top of the table to see the "(%)" in the column header. Another possibility would be to use percentages with one digit of precision after the decimal. In that case I would recommend putting the % explicitly after each number: it doesn’t take that much space.

• H, S, and L components, the first in degrees [0, 360) with one place after the decimal point, and the latter two as 3-digit decimals in range [0, 1] (or possibly percentages, as w/ RGB). The reason to include H, S, L is that SVG and HTML now support the use of these directly. There's no reason to include HSV, luma, component average, etc., since users need not input these directly, and they are not especially relevant to human vision anyway. They’re included in the example color table in the HSL/HSV article because in that context they are the quantities under discussion, but here they’re just noise.

• Possibly L*, a*, b* (or even just L*), since these are quantities which *are* (somewhat) relevant to human vision, and would potentially be useful to sort by. L* in particular is a pretty decent proxy for perceived lightness. The CIELAB components here could be computed either relative to D65, as in sRGB, or relative to D50, to match the CIELAB mode used by Photoshop and ICC profiles.

In other words, I would recommend using either 7 columns, or 8, or 10, but 21 is way out of hand.

Also, if columns need to be broken into sections, using narrow empty columns is a bad way to do it, since that breaks up the horizontal lines which allow tracking across rows, and in general looks very busy. If this is really necessary, it should perhaps be done using slight background color differences. I’m not convinced it matters though if the number of columns is kept in check.

Finally, the seemingly randomly bolded entries in the table seem like a bad idea to me.

Cheers, jacobolus (t) 19:04, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

I’m fine with combining the hexadecimal RGB representation into one column.

How are numbers in [0, 1] inherently more precise than numbers in [0, 100]? Percentages are established here, e.g. in CSS. Sadly, the decimal 8bit values are a standard way to enter, display or store colors, too, so we should probably keep them, but I agree that of all the RGB representations they are the ones to scrap (if any) – they could be moved to the title attribute. Percentages are used pretty much everywhere, except for hue. I don’t know whether you’ve seen it, but until yesterday I had the ‘%’ (and ‘°’) signs inside each cell. I don’t see the point in adding a decimal point and a digit to the percentages.

CSS’s inclusion of HSL was my reason to edit the table in the first place. I also added HSV/HSB (where hue is the same), because elsewhere it seems more popular, e.g. in {{infobox color}}. HSI (with its differing chroma) is mostly here for completeness (and I don’t remember why I put ℙs in there), also because it differs from HSL stronger than HSV. Y′₆₀₁ can safely go. As far as I know, HVC and HLC are sometimes used, but the HSI chroma may go.

I actually only accidentally saved the bold highlights for multiples of 30° and 25%.

Empty cells spanning the whole column are the easiest and most reliable way to simulate colgroup in Mediawiki. They may break sorting, though, but colspan does too. But I probably don’t notice drawbacks as much, because my user stylesheets include CSS row highlighting.

L*a*b* (lightness) might be useful, but I didn’t have a simple formula at hand the other day.

I wish columns were collapsible, but no admin implemented that. — Christoph Päper 11:53, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Color name	Sample	RGB16		R10	G10	B10		R (%)	G (%)	B (%)		C (%)		H (°)	S (%)	L (%)		H (°)	S (%)	B, V (%)		C (%)	H (°)	S (%)	I (%)
Alice Blue		#F0F8FF		240	248	255		94	97	100		6		208	3	97		208	6	100		5	208	3	97

Color name	Sample	RGB16	R (%)	G (%)	B (%)	C (%)	H (°)	SL (%)	SB (%)	SI (%)	L, I (%)	B, V (%)
Alice Blue		#F0F8FF	94	97	100	6	208	3	6	3	97	100

Color name	Sample		RGB16	R	G	B		H	S	L / B	C		H	S	I	C
Alice Blue			#F0F8FF	240 94%	248 97%	255 100%		208°	3% 6%	97% 100%	6%		208°	3%	97%	5%

Color name	Sample	RGB16	R	G	B	H	S	L	C
Alice Blue		#F0F8FF	94%	97%	100%	208°	3%	97%	6%

Okay, I really dislike your idea of showing multiple different quantities in a single column, just hidden away in a title attribute. However, showing alternate forms of the same quantity in a title view seems reasonable enough. Notice how your first few suggested tables here are really long and complicated but without any extra information likely to be useful to readers. We should chop those bits out. My suggestion would be something like the following:

	Name	8-bit hex	R	G	B	H	S	L
	Alice Blue	#F0F8FF	.941	.973	1.000	208.0°	100.0%	97.1%

Or perhaps (with some space to reduce the claustrophobic clutter):

	Name	8-bit hex	R	G	B	H	S	L
	Alice Blue	#F0F8FF	.941	.973	1.000	208.0°	100.0%	97.1%
	Antique White	#FAEBD7	.980	.922	.843	34.3°	77.8%	91.2%
	Cornflower	#6495ED	.392	.584	.929	218.5°	79.2%	66.1%

It’s just as well they don’t have collapsible columns. Sounds like a usability nightmare.

The goal here should be to (1) cut out as much redundant information as possible, while keeping those bits which are likely to be useful to many users (“completeness” as an abstract concept is decidedly not the goal, or we could include 100 extra columns for each of these), (2) present the whole thing in as clean and uncluttered a fashion as possible.

–jacobolus (t) 14:29, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Like I said, there’s no reason to use floats for RGB (or anything else). They’re even wider than the percentages, at least once you add the missing leading zero.

Three significant digits suggest more precision than there is and will probably reveal (more) rounding oddities that are not helpful.

title="248/255" is probably better than just title="248".

I don’t care about “Color name”/“Name” or “Sample”/“Color” (nor their order), but the caption for hex triplets should say that it is RGB. It indeed doesn’t have to be sortable.

Never use <tt> but <code>. Specifying column width would be the last thing to take care of.

“sRGB” in the title attributes is unnecessary, and so is “HSL” (if there’s only RGB and HSL).

I’m leaning towards preferring my second table layout above, with the first two colums of your first layout and explanatory text. How about leaving out ‘%’ completely and only adding ‘°’ to hues?

Anyhow, I just found the bug in my script that resulted in wrong saturation values for HSL, often equal or similar to those of HSI (like 3% for Alice Blue instead of 100%). — Christoph Päper 17:17, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

	Color	RGB16	R	G	B	C	H	SL	SV	SI	L	V
	Alice Blue	#F0F8FF	94	97	100	6	208°	100	6	3	97	100

Okay. There are no floats anywhere here. This is all decimals at some definite precision. I just prefer 3 digits of precision to 2, and prefer using a '.' at the front to a '%' at the end. Since most elementary school students are extensively trained in the decimal system, Wikipedia’s readership should be perfectly capable of reading decimal numbers in a table. A list of further comments:

• The symbols S_L, S_V, and C are not typical, and using them without further explanation (no, a link isn’t good enough) is a bad idea. The quantity C is used in the HSL and HSV article because it explains the derivation and helps relate the various quantities to each-other, but the use of words “chroma” and “saturation” is so variable among sources that it’s a bad idea to adopt that article’s naming conventions in places where they aren’t explicitly described (e.g. here). S_I is such a rarely seen quantity (and usually in conjunction with a different definition of hue than the one used in HSL/HSV) that it’s a bad idea to list it here: it just leads to confusion.
• There’s no need to include HSV in the table. Both HSL and HSV are terrible models which should be avoided to the extent possible (I say this having mostly written HSL and HSV), but HSL might as well be included since it is used by the web browsers themselves. But one of the two is more than enough. If we want other color descriptions we should use Munsell, CIELAB, CIECAM02, or similar.
• There’s no reason to make the hex value column sortable. The sorting of that column is redundant to sorting on R, G, B columns, and trying to sort by it will in practice only sort by R, which is confusing for users.
• Using both a link in the heading and a title attribute on the cell is self-defeating, because the wiki-link’s mouseover text will clobber the cell’s.
• I don’t care whether the color names are in TH elements or TD elements, but there’s no good reason to make the text bold (it's just a distraction), and it should be left-aligned.
• Any values which are percentages should have the percent sign explicitly written in the cells. To leave it out or put it at the top adds mental overhead for little gain.
• There are a couple reasons for using an 3 digits of precision. (1) There are about 2½ digits worth of precision in the original data range log₁₀(256) = 2.4, so only using 2 digits of precision is leaving off data. But anyway, these colors are defined to be these precise values, and so even in higher-precision output systems (>8 bits/channel) they are exactly reproducible. (2) There are on average about 2 and a half 8-bit numbers per integral percentage. To make these sort properly, 2 digits of precision are insufficient. In the case of HSL “lightness” (or other similarly motivated quantities) this is especially important in my opinion, since all of the components’ values contribute to this, making it effectively more finely tuned than individual RGB components. (3) It really isn’t any harder to read the table with an extra digit on these, since users should understand the decimal system pretty well, and can read from left to right (which means they should easily understand that ".358" is "about 36%").
• I don’t think it’s helpful to include a “hide” link to collapse the table. That’s just a distraction.
• RGB₁₆ is not a meaningful label. "Hex triplet" would be an okay label, but I personally think 8-bit hex is clearer. As for the “RGB” part. All of these quantities (R, G, B, hex, H, S, L) are just as dependent on “RGB” – or in this case specifically sRGB. Users will either recognize the #FFFFFF form, or click the link and figure out what a hex triplet is, or else ignore that column.
• All the numeric columns should be right-aligned.

–jacobolus (t) 20:06, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

I’ve changed the table to use {{Colort}} like List of colors does. — Christoph Päper 00:15, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

I like some of your improvements to the Colort template quite a bit. I wonder whether changing that template will tick off editors on other pages where it appears though. I’d edit the Colort template some myself, but changing templates which are used multiple places is always a bit of a touchy subject. –jacobolus (t) 01:34, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

┏━━━━━━━━━━━━┛
Since we’re apparently using fixed column widths here, we can probably actually get around the restriction on using colspan within a sortable table, by just stacking another table on top with a row of labels for multiple-column combined headings. Then we can put RGB (or perhaps sRGB), HSL, HSV column-spanning headings, and then simplify the column labels themselves to R, G, B, H, etc., and put the sorter widgets in-line next to those (and also get rid of the redundant links on every one of them). –jacobolus (t) 01:48, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

No nested tables please. — Christoph Päper 13:57, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Also, it’s IMO a bad idea to get rid of the border around the color sample itself (by making it the border), because (1) the color seen by the human eye is dramatically affected by nearby and especially adjoining colors, and providing the little gray gap between each color reduces this effect a fair bit, and (2) not having the horizontal lines go all the way across reduces the visual coherence of the table. –jacobolus (t) 01:55, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

It’s a drawback, yes, but a minor one in my opinion. If you sort the table you get different adjoining colors. — Christoph Päper 13:57, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Can you explain the benefit of making the color the border color instead of putting it in its own cell? I think the latter would be substantially better. –jacobolus (t) 17:54, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Also, I’d get rid of the bold on the color names, though they could certainly remain TH elements. –jacobolus (t) 01:58, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Let row headers be handled by sitewide or user stylesheets. — Christoph Päper 13:57, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

That's nonsense. 99.9% of users will get a worse design that way, and anyway most people probably want bold THs in most cases (i.e. for column headings) so the site-wide settings will be forced to be wrong for these color names. Basically, reasonable alternatives for this table are (1) use TD elements for the color names, or (2) use TH elements but make sure the text is left aligned and regular weight. I'm starting to favor (1) but I think (2) would be acceptable. Leaving the cells bold and horizontally centered is not acceptable. –jacobolus (t) 17:56, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

We should be able to calculate R, G, and B from the provided hex, and cut down on the things users need to enter for a color. For example, if we have the color #74DAF4, then its hex is 74DAF4, and we can do:

• red = {{hex2dec|{{padleft:|2|74DAF4}}}} → 116 ,
• green = {{#expr: {{hex2dec|{{padleft:|4|74DAF4}}}} mod {{hex2dec|100}} }} → 218,
• blue = {{#expr: {{hex2dec|74DAF4}} mod {{hex2dec|100}} }} → 244,
• etc.

And in fact, those would probably work best if we just made a templates for them, hexcolor2red, hexcolor2blue, hexcolor2green, etc. –jacobolus (t) 02:40, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Okay, I’ve added these, {{hexcolor2red}}, {{hexcolor2green}}, {{hexcolor2blue}}, and so you do {{hexcolor2red|74DAF4}} and you get 116, etc. –jacobolus (t) 19:15, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Using the intransparent “hex triplet” as base seems awful. I’d prefer percentages or floats, but even 8bit decimal integers are better than hex triplet. — Christoph Päper 13:57, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Seems awful why? The point is to simplify writing: the colors are generally defined in terms of the hex triplet, and it's not like people are going to be reading the raw source to find out what the R, G, and B components are. –jacobolus (t) 17:59, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

I just noticed, there’s actually quite a problem with using the result of using the RGB2HSL templates, and then rounding the results from those. Because those are numbers rounded to 3 digits, rounding a second time leads to incorrect rounding in some cases (e.g., 0.0045… rounds to 0.005 which rounds to 0.01, instead of the proper 0.00) We should either use the 3-digit rounding provided by the template, or else make a new template that rounds to 2 digits of precision. –jacobolus (t) 02:50, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

I wouldn’t call that “quite a problem”. The templates could be improved, though. (New ones are not needed.) — Christoph Päper 13:57, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

How would the templates be improved then? By adding a "precision" input or so? –jacobolus (t) 18:01, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Why is here the CSS3 color table? The X11 table in wiki code can be found here (since 2004).--Perhelion (talk) 20:38, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Coloring of color values

The numeric values for colors mentioned in the text of the article are currently displayed in the color they describe. Should they be? This doesn't strike me as something that should occur in the main text of an encyclopedia article, and it certainly doesn't help readability. —71.196.83.53 (talk) 08:24, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

The article now uses {{color sample}} instead of {{color}} in prose. — Christoph Päper 12:09, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

LaserLemon vs LightGoldenrodYellow

Disregard my original comment. I see that "LightGoldenrodYellow" has been shortened to be "LightGoldenrod" in the table, and "LaserLemon" has been added to the table. Why? LaserLemon is not listed in the CSS level 3 spec. Sprokofiev (talk) 01:41, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Removed the WhiteSmoke redirect

I removed the the following, as WhiteSmoke (Virus) is now a redlink.

{{Redirect|WhiteSmoke|the computer virus connected with Norton AntiVirus|WhiteSmoke (Virus)}}

Tony Mach (talk) 21:36, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

You left it in a comment. I removed that, too. — Christoph Päper 11:54, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Ah, OK! Tony Mach (talk) 12:54, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Full Circle

The circle is almost complete X11 -> SVG + HTML colors -> CSS -> X11. Though the server no longer uses the rgb.txt file, but uses a builtin hardcoded database instead which hasn't yet been updated. Sounds like this will happen after 1.16. PaleAqua (talk) 03:39, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

abridged and rationalized

So who is abridging and rationalising? And hence isn't that self publishing and a POV? The article is X11 not W3C, so shouldn't the list BE THE LIST, THE X11 list. W3C references should be in w3C articles. If someone want a list of X11 colours supported by browsers, put that list in an article re browser colour support. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mimarx (talk • contribs) 06:18, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

 Done — Christoph Päper 10:40, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Numbered variants

Colors

Name	Hex (RGB)	Red (RGB)	Green (RGB)	Blue (RGB)	Hue (HSL/HSV)	Satur. (HSL)	Light (HSL)	Satur. (HSV)	Value (HSV)
Antique White	#FAEBD7	98%	92%	84%	34°	78%	91%	14%	98%
Antique White 1	#FFEFDB	100%	94%	86%	33°	100%	93%	14%	100%
Antique White 2	#EEDFCC	93%	87%	80%	34°	50%	87%	14%	93%
Antique White 3	#CDC0B0	80%	75%	69%	33°	23%	75%	14%	80%
Antique White 4	#8B8378	55%	51%	47%	35°	8%	51%	14%	55%
Aquamarine 1	#7FFFD4	50%	100%	83%	160°	100%	75%	50%	100%	Aquamarine
Aquamarine 2	#76EEC6	46%	93%	78%	160°	78%	70%	50%	93%
Aquamarine 3	#66CDAA	40%	80%	67%	160°	51%	60%	50%	80%
Aquamarine 4	#458B74	27%	55%	45%	160°	34%	41%	50%	55%
Azure 1	#F0FFFF	94%	100%	100%	180°	100%	97%	6%	100%	Azure
Azure 2	#E0EEEE	88%	93%	93%	180°	29%	91%	6%	93%
Azure 3	#C1CDCD	76%	80%	80%	180°	11%	78%	6%	80%
Azure 4	#838B8B	51%	55%	55%	180°	3%	53%	6%	55%
Bisque 1	#FFE4C4	100%	89%	77%	33°	100%	88%	23%	100%	Bisque
Bisque 2	#EED5B7	93%	84%	72%	33°	62%	83%	23%	93%
Bisque 3	#CDB79E	80%	72%	62%	32°	32%	71%	23%	80%
Bisque 4	#8B7D6B	55%	49%	42%	34°	13%	48%	23%	55%
Blue 1	#0000FF	0%	0%	100%	240°	100%	50%	100%	100%	Blue
Blue 2	#0000EE	0%	0%	93%	240°	100%	47%	100%	93%
Blue 3	#0000CD	0%	0%	80%	240°	100%	40%	100%	80%
Blue 4	#00008B	0%	0%	55%	240°	100%	27%	100%	55%
Brown	#A52A2A	65%	16%	16%	0°	59%	41%	75%	65%
Brown 1	#FF4040	100%	25%	25%	0°	100%	63%	75%	100%
Brown 2	#EE3B3B	93%	23%	23%	0°	84%	58%	75%	93%
Brown 3	#CD3333	80%	20%	20%	0°	61%	50%	75%	80%
Brown 4	#8B2323	55%	14%	14%	0°	60%	34%	75%	55%
Burlywood	#DEB887	87%	72%	53%	34°	57%	70%	39%	87%
Burlywood 1	#FFD39B	100%	83%	61%	34°	100%	80%	39%	100%
Burlywood 2	#EEC591	93%	77%	57%	34°	73%	75%	39%	93%
Burlywood 3	#CDAA7D	80%	67%	49%	34°	44%	65%	39%	80%
Burlywood 4	#8B7355	55%	45%	33%	33°	24%	44%	39%	55%
Cadet Blue	#5F9EA0	37%	62%	63%	182°	26%	50%	41%	63%
Cadet Blue 1	#98F5FF	60%	96%	100%	186°	100%	80%	40%	100%
Cadet Blue 2	#8EE5EE	56%	90%	93%	186°	74%	75%	40%	93%
Cadet Blue 3	#7AC5CD	48%	77%	80%	186°	45%	64%	41%	80%
Cadet Blue 4	#53868B	33%	53%	55%	185°	25%	44%	40%	55%
Chartreuse	#7FFF00	50%	100%	0%	90°	100%	50%	100%	100%
Chartreuse 1	#7FFF00	50%	100%	0%	90°	100%	50%	100%	100%
Chartreuse 2	#76EE00	46%	93%	0%	90°	100%	47%	100%	93%
Chartreuse 3	#66CD00	40%	80%	0%	90°	100%	40%	100%	80%
Chartreuse 4	#458B00	27%	55%	0%	90°	100%	27%	100%	55%
Chocolate	#D2691E	82%	41%	12%	25°	75%	47%	86%	82%
Chocolate 1	#FF7F24	100%	50%	14%	25°	100%	57%	86%	100%
Chocolate 2	#EE7621	93%	46%	13%	25°	86%	53%	86%	93%
Chocolate 3	#CD661D	80%	40%	11%	25°	75%	46%	86%	80%
Chocolate 4	#8B4513	55%	27%	7%	25°	76%	31%	86%	55%
Coral	#FF7F50	100%	50%	31%	16°	100%	66%	69%	100%
Coral 1	#FF7256	100%	45%	34%	10°	100%	67%	66%	100%
Coral 2	#EE6A50	93%	42%	31%	10°	82%	62%	66%	93%
Coral 3	#CD5B45	80%	36%	27%	10°	58%	54%	66%	80%
Coral 4	#8B3E2F	55%	24%	18%	10°	50%	37%	66%	55%
Cornsilk 1	#FFF8DC	100%	97%	86%	48°	100%	93%	14%	100%	Cornsilk
Cornsilk 2	#EEE8CD	93%	91%	80%	49°	49%	87%	14%	93%
Cornsilk 3	#CDC8B1	80%	78%	69%	49°	22%	75%	14%	80%
Cornsilk 4	#8B8878	55%	53%	47%	51°	8%	51%	14%	55%
Cyan 1	#00FFFF	0%	100%	100%	180°	100%	50%	100%	100%	Cyan
Cyan 2	#00EEEE	0%	93%	93%	180°	100%	47%	100%	93%
Cyan 3	#00CDCD	0%	80%	80%	180°	100%	40%	100%	80%
Cyan 4	#008B8B	0%	55%	55%	180°	100%	27%	100%	55%
Dark Goldenrod	#B8860B	72%	53%	4%	43°	89%	38%	94%	72%
Dark Goldenrod 1	#FFB90F	100%	73%	6%	43°	100%	53%	94%	100%
Dark Goldenrod 2	#EEAD0E	93%	68%	5%	43°	89%	49%	94%	93%
Dark Goldenrod 3	#CD950C	80%	58%	5%	43°	89%	43%	94%	80%
Dark Goldenrod 4	#8B6508	55%	40%	3%	43°	89%	29%	94%	55%
Dark Olive Green	#556B2F	33%	42%	18%	82°	39%	30%	56%	42%
Dark Olive Green 1	#CAFF70	79%	100%	44%	82°	100%	72%	56%	100%
Dark Olive Green 2	#BCEE68	74%	93%	41%	82°	80%	67%	56%	93%
Dark Olive Green 3	#A2CD5A	64%	80%	35%	82°	54%	58%	56%	80%
Dark Olive Green 4	#6E8B3D	43%	55%	24%	82°	39%	39%	56%	55%
Dark Orange	#FF8C00	100%	55%	0%	33°	100%	50%	100%	100%
Dark Orange 1	#FF7F00	100%	50%	0%	30°	100%	50%	100%	100%
Dark Orange 2	#EE7600	93%	46%	0%	30°	100%	47%	100%	93%
Dark Orange 3	#CD6600	80%	40%	0%	30°	100%	40%	100%	80%
Dark Orange 4	#8B4500	55%	27%	0%	30°	100%	27%	100%	55%
Dark Orchid	#9932CC	60%	20%	80%	280°	61%	50%	76%	80%
Dark Orchid 1	#BF3EFF	75%	24%	100%	280°	100%	62%	76%	100%
Dark Orchid 2	#B23AEE	70%	23%	93%	280°	84%	58%	76%	93%
Dark Orchid 3	#9A32CD	60%	20%	80%	280°	61%	50%	76%	80%
Dark Orchid 4	#68228B	41%	13%	55%	280°	61%	34%	76%	55%
Dark Sea Green	#8FBC8F	56%	74%	56%	120°	25%	65%	24%	74%
Dark Sea Green 1	#C1FFC1	76%	100%	76%	120°	100%	88%	24%	100%
Dark Sea Green 2	#B4EEB4	71%	93%	71%	120°	63%	82%	24%	93%
Dark Sea Green 3	#9BCD9B	61%	80%	61%	120°	33%	71%	24%	80%
Dark Sea Green 4	#698B69	41%	55%	41%	120°	14%	48%	25%	55%
Dark Slate Gray	#2F4F4F	18%	31%	31%	180°	25%	25%	41%	31%
Dark Slate Gray 1	#97FFFF	59%	100%	100%	180°	100%	80%	41%	100%
Dark Slate Gray 2	#8DEEEE	55%	93%	93%	180°	74%	74%	41%	93%
Dark Slate Gray 3	#79CDCD	47%	80%	80%	180°	46%	64%	41%	80%
Dark Slate Gray 4	#528B8B	32%	55%	55%	180°	26%	43%	41%	55%
Deep Pink 1	#FF1493	100%	8%	58%	328°	100%	54%	92%	100%	Deep Pink
Deep Pink 2	#EE1289	93%	7%	54%	328°	87%	50%	92%	93%
Deep Pink 3	#CD1076	80%	6%	46%	328°	86%	43%	92%	80%
Deep Pink 4	#8B0A50	55%	4%	31%	327°	87%	29%	93%	55%
Deep Sky Blue 1	#00BFFF	0%	75%	100%	195°	100%	50%	100%	100%	Deep Sky Blue
Deep Sky Blue 2	#00B2EE	0%	70%	93%	195°	100%	47%	100%	93%
Deep Sky Blue 3	#009ACD	0%	60%	80%	195°	100%	40%	100%	80%
Deep Sky Blue 4	#00688B	0%	41%	55%	195°	100%	27%	100%	55%
Dodger Blue 1	#1E90FF	12%	56%	100%	210°	100%	56%	88%	100%	Dodger Blue
Dodger Blue 2	#1C86EE	11%	53%	93%	210°	86%	52%	88%	93%
Dodger Blue 3	#1874CD	9%	45%	80%	210°	79%	45%	88%	80%
Dodger Blue 4	#104E8B	6%	31%	55%	210°	79%	30%	89%	55%
Firebrick	#B22222	70%	13%	13%	0°	68%	42%	81%	70%
Firebrick 1	#FF3030	100%	19%	19%	0°	100%	59%	81%	100%
Firebrick 2	#EE2C2C	93%	17%	17%	0°	85%	55%	82%	93%
Firebrick 3	#CD2626	80%	15%	15%	0°	69%	48%	82%	80%
Firebrick 4	#8B1A1A	55%	10%	10%	0°	69%	32%	81%	55%
Gold 1	#FFD700	100%	84%	0%	51°	100%	50%	100%	100%	Gold
Gold 2	#EEC900	93%	79%	0%	51°	100%	47%	100%	93%
Gold 3	#CDAD00	80%	68%	0%	51°	100%	40%	100%	80%
Gold 4	#8B7500	55%	46%	0%	51°	100%	27%	100%	55%
Goldenrod	#DAA520	85%	65%	13%	43°	74%	49%	85%	86%
Goldenrod 1	#FFC125	100%	76%	15%	43°	100%	57%	86%	100%
Goldenrod 2	#EEB422	93%	71%	13%	43°	86%	53%	86%	93%
Goldenrod 3	#CD9B1D	80%	61%	11%	43°	75%	46%	86%	80%
Goldenrod 4	#8B6914	55%	41%	8%	43°	75%	31%	86%	55%
Green 1	#00FF00	0%	100%	0%	120°	100%	50%	100%	100%	Green
Green 2	#00EE00	0%	93%	0%	120°	100%	47%	100%	93%
Green 3	#00CD00	0%	80%	0%	120°	100%	40%	100%	80%
Green 4	#008B00	0%	55%	0%	120°	100%	27%	100%	55%
Honeydew 1	#F0FFF0	94%	100%	94%	120°	100%	97%	6%	100%	Honeydew
Honeydew 2	#E0EEE0	88%	93%	88%	120°	29%	91%	6%	93%
Honeydew 3	#C1CDC1	76%	80%	76%	120°	11%	78%	6%	80%
Honeydew 4	#838B83	51%	55%	51%	120°	3%	53%	6%	55%
Hot Pink	#FF69B4	100%	41%	71%	330°	100%	71%	59%	100%
Hot Pink 1	#FF6EB4	100%	43%	71%	331°	100%	72%	57%	100%
Hot Pink 2	#EE6AA7	93%	42%	65%	332°	80%	68%	56%	93%
Hot Pink 3	#CD6090	80%	38%	56%	334°	52%	59%	53%	80%
Hot Pink 4	#8B3A62	55%	23%	38%	330°	41%	39%	58%	55%
Indian Red	#CD5C5C	80%	36%	36%	0°	53%	58%	55%	80%
Indian Red 1	#FF6A6A	100%	42%	42%	0°	100%	71%	58%	100%
Indian Red 2	#EE6363	93%	39%	39%	0°	80%	66%	58%	93%
Indian Red 3	#CD5555	80%	33%	33%	0°	55%	57%	59%	80%
Indian Red 4	#8B3A3A	55%	23%	23%	0°	41%	39%	58%	55%
Indigo	#4B0082	29%	0%	51%	275°	100%	26%	100%	51%
Indigo 2	#218868	13%	53%	41%	161°	61%	33%	76%	53%
Ivory 1	#FFFFF0	100%	100%	94%	60°	100%	97%	6%	100%	Ivory
Ivory 2	#EEEEE0	93%	93%	88%	60°	29%	91%	6%	93%
Ivory 3	#CDCDC1	80%	80%	76%	60°	11%	78%	6%	80%
Ivory 4	#8B8B83	55%	55%	51%	60°	3%	53%	6%	55%
Khaki	#F0E68C	94%	90%	55%	54°	77%	75%	42%	94%
Khaki 1	#FFF68F	100%	96%	56%	55°	100%	78%	44%	100%
Khaki 2	#EEE685	93%	90%	52%	55°	76%	73%	44%	93%
Khaki 3	#CDC673	80%	78%	45%	55°	47%	63%	44%	80%
Khaki 4	#8B864E	55%	53%	31%	55°	28%	43%	44%	55%
Lavender Blush 1	#FFF0F5	100%	94%	96%	340°	100%	97%	6%	100%	Lavender Blush
Lavender Blush 2	#EEE0E5	93%	88%	90%	339°	29%	91%	6%	93%
Lavender Blush 3	#CDC1C5	80%	76%	77%	340°	11%	78%	6%	80%
Lavender Blush 4	#8B8386	55%	51%	53%	338°	3%	53%	6%	55%
Lemon Chiffon 1	#FFFACD	100%	98%	80%	54°	100%	90%	20%	100%	Lemon Chiffon
Lemon Chiffon 2	#EEE9BF	93%	91%	75%	54°	58%	84%	20%	93%
Lemon Chiffon 3	#CDC9A5	80%	79%	65%	54°	29%	73%	20%	80%
Lemon Chiffon 4	#8B8970	55%	54%	44%	56°	11%	49%	19%	55%
Light Blue	#ADD8E6	68%	85%	90%	195°	53%	79%	25%	90%
Light Blue 1	#BFEFFF	75%	94%	100%	195°	100%	88%	25%	100%
Light Blue 2	#B2DFEE	70%	87%	93%	195°	64%	82%	25%	93%
Light Blue 3	#9AC0CD	60%	75%	80%	195°	34%	70%	25%	80%
Light Blue 4	#68838B	41%	51%	55%	194°	14%	48%	25%	55%
Light Cyan 1	#E0FFFF	88%	100%	100%	180°	100%	94%	12%	100%	Light Cyan
Light Cyan 2	#D1EEEE	82%	93%	93%	180°	46%	88%	12%	93%
Light Cyan 3	#B4CDCD	71%	80%	80%	180°	20%	76%	12%	80%
Light Cyan 4	#7A8B8B	48%	55%	55%	180°	7%	51%	12%	55%
Light Goldenrod	#EEDD82	93%	87%	51%	51°	76%	72%	45%	93%
Light Goldenrod 1	#FFEC8B	100%	93%	55%	50°	100%	77%	46%	100%
Light Goldenrod 2	#EEDC82	93%	86%	51%	50°	76%	72%	45%	93%
Light Goldenrod 3	#CDBE70	80%	75%	44%	50°	48%	62%	45%	80%
Light Goldenrod 4	#8B814C	55%	51%	30%	51°	29%	42%	45%	55%
Light Pink	#FFB6C1	100%	71%	76%	351°	100%	86%	29%	100%
Light Pink 1	#FFAEB9	100%	68%	73%	352°	100%	84%	32%	100%
Light Pink 2	#EEA2AD	93%	64%	68%	351°	69%	78%	32%	93%
Light Pink 3	#CD8C95	80%	55%	58%	352°	39%	68%	32%	80%
Light Pink 4	#8B5F65	55%	37%	40%	352°	19%	46%	32%	55%
Light Salmon 1	#FFA07A	100%	63%	48%	17°	100%	74%	52%	100%	Light Salmon
Light Salmon 2	#EE9572	93%	58%	45%	17°	79%	69%	52%	93%
Light Salmon 3	#CD8162	80%	51%	38%	17°	52%	59%	52%	80%
Light Salmon 4	#8B5742	55%	34%	26%	17°	36%	40%	53%	55%
Light Sky Blue	#87CEFA	53%	81%	98%	203°	92%	76%	46%	98%
Light Sky Blue 1	#B0E2FF	69%	89%	100%	202°	100%	85%	31%	100%
Light Sky Blue 2	#A4D3EE	64%	83%	93%	202°	69%	79%	31%	93%
Light Sky Blue 3	#8DB6CD	55%	71%	80%	202°	39%	68%	31%	80%
Light Sky Blue 4	#607B8B	38%	48%	55%	202°	18%	46%	31%	55%
Light Steel Blue	#B0C4DE	69%	77%	87%	214°	41%	78%	21%	87%
Light Steel Blue 1	#CAE1FF	79%	88%	100%	214°	100%	90%	21%	100%
Light Steel Blue 2	#BCD2EE	74%	82%	93%	214°	60%	84%	21%	93%
Light Steel Blue 3	#A2B5CD	64%	71%	80%	214°	30%	72%	21%	80%
Light Steel Blue 4	#6E7B8B	43%	48%	55%	213°	12%	49%	21%	55%
Light Yellow 1	#FFFFE0	100%	100%	88%	60°	100%	94%	12%	100%	Light Yellow
Light Yellow 2	#EEEED1	93%	93%	82%	60°	46%	88%	12%	93%
Light Yellow 3	#CDCDB4	80%	80%	71%	60°	20%	76%	12%	80%
Light Yellow 4	#8B8B7A	55%	55%	48%	60°	7%	51%	12%	55%
Magenta 1	#FF00FF	100%	0%	100%	300°	100%	50%	100%	100%	Magenta
Magenta 2	#EE00EE	93%	0%	93%	300°	100%	47%	100%	93%
Magenta 3	#CD00CD	80%	0%	80%	300°	100%	40%	100%	80%
Magenta 4	#8B008B	55%	0%	55%	300°	100%	27%	100%	55%
Maroon	#B03060	69%	19%	38%	338°	57%	44%	73%	69%
Maroon 1	#FF34B3	100%	20%	70%	323°	100%	60%	80%	100%
Maroon 2	#EE30A7	93%	19%	65%	322°	85%	56%	80%	93%
Maroon 3	#CD2990	80%	16%	56%	322°	67%	48%	80%	80%
Maroon 4	#8B1C62	55%	11%	38%	322°	67%	33%	80%	55%
Medium Orchid	#BA55D3	73%	33%	83%	288°	59%	58%	60%	83%
Medium Orchid 1	#E066FF	88%	40%	100%	288°	100%	70%	60%	100%
Medium Orchid 2	#D15FEE	82%	37%	93%	288°	81%	65%	60%	93%
Medium Orchid 3	#B452CD	71%	32%	80%	288°	55%	56%	60%	80%
Medium Orchid 4	#7A378B	48%	22%	55%	288°	43%	38%	60%	55%
Medium Purple	#9370DB	58%	44%	86%	260°	60%	65%	49%	86%
Medium Purple 1	#AB82FF	67%	51%	100%	260°	100%	76%	49%	100%
Medium Purple 2	#9F79EE	62%	47%	93%	260°	78%	70%	49%	93%
Medium Purple 3	#8968CD	54%	41%	80%	260°	50%	61%	49%	80%
Medium Purple 4	#5D478B	36%	28%	55%	259°	32%	41%	49%	55%
Misty Rose	#FFE4E1	100%	89%	88%	6°	100%	94%	12%	100%
Misty Rose 1	#FFE4E1	100%	89%	88%	6°	100%	94%	12%	100%
Misty Rose 2	#EED5D2	93%	84%	82%	6°	45%	88%	12%	93%
Misty Rose 3	#CDB7B5	80%	72%	71%	5°	19%	76%	12%	80%
Misty Rose 4	#8B7D7B	55%	49%	48%	8°	7%	51%	12%	55%
Navajo White 1	#FFDEAD	100%	87%	68%	36°	100%	84%	32%	100%	Navajo White
Navajo White 2	#EECFA1	93%	81%	63%	36°	69%	78%	32%	93%
Navajo White 3	#CDB38B	80%	70%	55%	36°	40%	68%	32%	80%
Navajo White 4	#8B795E	55%	47%	37%	36°	19%	46%	32%	55%
Olive Drab	#6B8E23	42%	56%	14%	80°	61%	35%	75%	56%
Olive Drab 1	#C0FF3E	75%	100%	24%	80°	100%	62%	76%	100%
Olive Drab 2	#B3EE3A	70%	93%	23%	80°	84%	58%	76%	93%
Olive Drab 3	#9ACD32	60%	80%	20%	80°	61%	50%	76%	80%
Olive Drab 4	#698B22	41%	55%	13%	79°	61%	34%	76%	55%
Orange 1	#FFA500	100%	65%	0%	39°	100%	50%	100%	100%	Orange
Orange 2	#EE9A00	93%	60%	0%	39°	100%	47%	100%	93%
Orange 3	#CD8500	80%	52%	0%	39°	100%	40%	100%	80%
Orange 4	#8B5A00	55%	35%	0%	39°	100%	27%	100%	55%
Orange Red 1	#FF4500	100%	27%	0%	16°	100%	50%	100%	100%	Orange Red
Orange Red 2	#EE4000	93%	25%	0%	16°	100%	47%	100%	93%
Orange Red 3	#CD3700	80%	22%	0%	16°	100%	40%	100%	80%
Orange Red 4	#8B2500	55%	15%	0%	16°	100%	27%	100%	55%
Orchid	#DA70D6	85%	44%	84%	302°	59%	65%	49%	86%
Orchid 1	#FF83FA	100%	51%	98%	302°	100%	76%	49%	100%
Orchid 2	#EE7AE9	93%	48%	91%	303°	77%	71%	49%	93%
Orchid 3	#CD69C9	80%	41%	79%	302°	50%	61%	49%	80%
Orchid 4	#8B4789	55%	28%	54%	302°	32%	41%	49%	55%
Pale Green	#98FB98	60%	98%	60%	120°	93%	79%	39%	98%
Pale Green 1	#9AFF9A	60%	100%	60%	120°	100%	80%	40%	100%
Pale Green 2	#90EE90	56%	93%	56%	120°	73%	75%	40%	93%
Pale Green 3	#7CCD7C	49%	80%	49%	120°	45%	65%	40%	80%
Pale Green 4	#548B54	33%	55%	33%	120°	25%	44%	40%	55%
Pale Turquoise	#AFEEEE	69%	93%	93%	180°	65%	81%	27%	93%
Pale Turquoise 1	#BBFFFF	73%	100%	100%	180°	100%	87%	27%	100%
Pale Turquoise 2	#AEEEEE	68%	93%	93%	180°	65%	81%	27%	93%
Pale Turquoise 3	#96CDCD	59%	80%	80%	180°	36%	70%	27%	80%
Pale Turquoise 4	#668B8B	40%	55%	55%	180°	15%	47%	27%	55%
Pale Violet Red	#DB7093	86%	44%	58%	340°	60%	65%	49%	86%
Pale Violet Red 1	#FF82AB	100%	51%	67%	340°	100%	76%	49%	100%
Pale Violet Red 2	#EE799F	93%	47%	62%	341°	78%	70%	49%	93%
Pale Violet Red 3	#CD6889	80%	41%	54%	340°	50%	61%	49%	80%
Pale Violet Red 4	#8B475D	55%	28%	36%	341°	32%	41%	49%	55%
Peach Puff 1	#FFDAB9	100%	85%	73%	28°	100%	86%	28%	100%	Peach Puff
Peach Puff 2	#EECBAD	93%	80%	68%	28°	66%	81%	27%	93%
Peach Puff 3	#CDAF95	80%	69%	58%	28°	36%	69%	27%	80%
Peach Puff 4	#8B7765	55%	47%	40%	28°	16%	47%	27%	55%
Pink	#FFC0CB	100%	75%	80%	350°	100%	88%	25%	100%
Pink 1	#FFB5C5	100%	71%	77%	347°	100%	86%	29%	100%
Pink 2	#EEA9B8	93%	66%	72%	347°	67%	80%	29%	93%
Pink 3	#CD919E	80%	57%	62%	347°	38%	69%	29%	80%
Pink 4	#8B636C	55%	39%	42%	347°	17%	47%	29%	55%
Plum	#DDA0DD	87%	63%	87%	300°	47%	75%	28%	87%
Plum 1	#FFBBFF	100%	73%	100%	300°	100%	87%	27%	100%
Plum 2	#EEAEEE	93%	68%	93%	300°	65%	81%	27%	93%
Plum 3	#CD96CD	80%	59%	80%	300°	36%	70%	27%	80%
Plum 4	#8B668B	55%	40%	55%	300°	15%	47%	27%	55%
Purple	#A020F0	63%	13%	94%	277°	87%	53%	87%	94%
Purple 1	#9B30FF	61%	19%	100%	271°	100%	59%	81%	100%
Purple 2	#912CEE	57%	17%	93%	271°	85%	55%	82%	93%
Purple 3	#7D26CD	49%	15%	80%	271°	69%	48%	82%	80%
Purple 4	#551A8B	33%	10%	55%	271°	69%	32%	81%	55%
Red 1	#FF0000	100%	0%	0%	0°	100%	50%	100%	100%	Red
Red 2	#EE0000	93%	0%	0%	0°	100%	47%	100%	93%
Red 3	#CD0000	80%	0%	0%	0°	100%	40%	100%	80%
Red 4	#8B0000	55%	0%	0%	0°	100%	27%	100%	55%
Rosy Brown	#BC8F8F	74%	56%	56%	0°	25%	65%	24%	74%
Rosy Brown 1	#FFC1C1	100%	76%	76%	0°	100%	88%	24%	100%
Rosy Brown 2	#EEB4B4	93%	71%	71%	0°	63%	82%	24%	93%
Rosy Brown 3	#CD9B9B	80%	61%	61%	0°	33%	71%	24%	80%
Rosy Brown 4	#8B6969	55%	41%	41%	0°	14%	48%	25%	55%
Royal Blue	#4169E1	25%	41%	88%	225°	73%	57%	71%	88%
Royal Blue 1	#4876FF	28%	46%	100%	225°	100%	64%	72%	100%
Royal Blue 2	#436EEE	26%	43%	93%	225°	83%	60%	72%	93%
Royal Blue 3	#3A5FCD	23%	37%	80%	225°	60%	52%	72%	80%
Royal Blue 4	#27408B	15%	25%	55%	225°	56%	35%	72%	55%
Salmon	#FA8072	98%	50%	45%	6°	93%	71%	54%	98%
Salmon 1	#FF8C69	100%	55%	41%	14°	100%	71%	59%	100%
Salmon 2	#EE8262	93%	51%	38%	14°	81%	66%	59%	93%
Salmon 3	#CD7054	80%	44%	33%	14°	55%	57%	59%	80%
Salmon 4	#8B4C39	55%	30%	22%	14°	42%	38%	59%	55%
Sea Green	#2E8B57	18%	55%	34%	147°	50%	36%	67%	55%
Sea Green 1	#54FF9F	33%	100%	62%	146°	100%	67%	67%	100%
Sea Green 2	#4EEE94	31%	93%	58%	146°	83%	62%	67%	93%
Sea Green 3	#43CD80	26%	80%	50%	147°	58%	53%	67%	80%
Sea Green 4	#2E8B57	18%	55%	34%	147°	50%	36%	67%	55%
Seashell 1	#FFF5EE	100%	96%	93%	25°	100%	97%	7%	100%	Seashell
Seashell 2	#EEE5DE	93%	90%	87%	26°	32%	90%	7%	93%
Seashell 3	#CDC5BF	80%	77%	75%	26°	12%	78%	7%	80%
Seashell 4	#8B8682	55%	53%	51%	27°	4%	53%	7%	55%
Sienna	#A0522D	63%	32%	18%	19°	56%	40%	72%	63%
Sienna 1	#FF8247	100%	51%	28%	19°	100%	64%	72%	100%
Sienna 2	#EE7942	93%	47%	26%	19°	84%	60%	72%	93%
Sienna 3	#CD6839	80%	41%	22%	19°	60%	51%	72%	80%
Sienna 4	#8B4726	55%	28%	15%	20°	57%	35%	73%	55%
Sky Blue	#87CEEB	53%	81%	92%	197°	71%	73%	43%	92%
Sky Blue 1	#87CEFF	53%	81%	100%	205°	100%	77%	47%	100%
Sky Blue 2	#7EC0EE	49%	75%	93%	205°	77%	71%	47%	93%
Sky Blue 3	#6CA6CD	42%	65%	80%	204°	49%	61%	47%	80%
Sky Blue 4	#4A708B	29%	44%	55%	205°	31%	42%	47%	55%
Slate Blue	#6A5ACD	42%	35%	80%	248°	54%	58%	56%	80%
Slate Blue 1	#836FFF	51%	44%	100%	248°	100%	72%	57%	100%
Slate Blue 2	#7A67EE	48%	40%	93%	248°	80%	67%	57%	93%
Slate Blue 3	#6959CD	41%	35%	80%	248°	54%	58%	57%	80%
Slate Blue 4	#473C8B	28%	24%	55%	248°	40%	39%	57%	55%
Slate Gray	#708090	44%	50%	56%	210°	13%	50%	22%	57%
Slate Gray 1	#C6E2FF	78%	89%	100%	211°	100%	89%	22%	100%
Slate Gray 2	#B9D3EE	73%	83%	93%	211°	61%	83%	22%	93%
Slate Gray 3	#9FB6CD	62%	71%	80%	210°	32%	71%	22%	80%
Slate Gray 4	#6C7B8B	42%	48%	55%	211°	13%	48%	22%	55%
Snow 1	#FFFAFA	100%	98%	98%	0°	100%	99%	2%	100%	Snow
Snow 2	#EEE9E9	93%	91%	91%	0°	13%	92%	2%	93%
Snow 3	#CDC9C9	80%	79%	79%	0°	4%	80%	2%	80%
Snow 4	#8B8989	55%	54%	54%	0°	1%	54%	1%	55%
Spring Green 1	#00FF7F	0%	100%	50%	150°	100%	50%	100%	100%	Spring Green
Spring Green 2	#00EE76	0%	93%	46%	150°	100%	47%	100%	93%
Spring Green 3	#00CD66	0%	80%	40%	150°	100%	40%	100%	80%
Spring Green 4	#008B45	0%	55%	27%	150°	100%	27%	100%	55%
Steel Blue	#4682B4	27%	51%	71%	207°	44%	49%	61%	71%
Steel Blue 1	#63B8FF	39%	72%	100%	207°	100%	69%	61%	100%
Steel Blue 2	#5CACEE	36%	67%	93%	207°	81%	65%	61%	93%
Steel Blue 3	#4F94CD	31%	58%	80%	207°	56%	56%	62%	80%
Steel Blue 4	#36648B	21%	39%	55%	208°	44%	38%	61%	55%
Tan	#D2B48C	82%	71%	55%	34°	44%	69%	33%	82%
Tan 1	#FFA54F	100%	65%	31%	29°	100%	66%	69%	100%
Tan 2	#EE9A49	93%	60%	29%	30°	83%	61%	69%	93%
Tan 3	#CD853F	80%	52%	25%	30°	59%	53%	69%	80%
Tan 4	#8B5A2B	55%	35%	17%	29°	53%	36%	69%	55%
Thistle	#D8BFD8	85%	75%	85%	300°	24%	80%	12%	85%
Thistle 1	#FFE1FF	100%	88%	100%	300°	100%	94%	12%	100%
Thistle 2	#EED2EE	93%	82%	93%	300°	45%	88%	12%	93%
Thistle 3	#CDB5CD	80%	71%	80%	300°	19%	76%	12%	80%
Thistle 4	#8B7B8B	55%	48%	55%	300°	7%	51%	12%	55%
Tomato 1	#FF6347	100%	39%	28%	9°	100%	64%	72%	100%	Tomato
Tomato 2	#EE5C42	93%	36%	26%	9°	84%	60%	72%	93%
Tomato 3	#CD4F39	80%	31%	22%	9°	60%	51%	72%	80%
Tomato 4	#8B3626	55%	21%	15%	10°	57%	35%	73%	55%
Turquoise	#40E0D0	25%	88%	82%	174°	72%	57%	71%	88%
Turquoise 1	#00F5FF	0%	96%	100%	182°	100%	50%	100%	100%
Turquoise 2	#00E5EE	0%	90%	93%	182°	100%	47%	100%	93%
Turquoise 3	#00C5CD	0%	77%	80%	182°	100%	40%	100%	80%
Turquoise 4	#00868B	0%	53%	55%	182°	100%	27%	100%	55%
Violet Red	#D02090	82%	13%	56%	322°	73%	47%	85%	82%
Violet Red 1	#FF3E96	100%	24%	59%	333°	100%	62%	76%	100%
Violet Red 2	#EE3A8C	93%	23%	55%	333°	84%	58%	76%	93%
Violet Red 3	#CD3278	80%	20%	47%	333°	61%	50%	76%	80%
Violet Red 4	#8B2252	55%	13%	32%	333°	61%	34%	76%	55%
Wheat	#F5DEB3	96%	87%	70%	39°	77%	83%	27%	96%
Wheat 1	#FFE7BA	100%	91%	73%	39°	100%	87%	27%	100%
Wheat 2	#EED8AE	93%	85%	68%	39°	65%	81%	27%	93%
Wheat 3	#CDBA96	80%	73%	59%	39°	36%	70%	27%	80%
Wheat 4	#8B7E66	55%	49%	40%	39°	15%	47%	27%	55%
Yellow 1	#FFFF00	100%	100%	0%	60°	100%	50%	100%	100%	Yellow
Yellow 2	#EEEE00	93%	93%	0%	60°	100%	47%	100%	93%
Yellow 3	#CDCD00	80%	80%	0%	60°	100%	40%	100%	80%
Yellow 4	#8B8B00	55%	55%	0%	60°	100%	27%	100%	55%

I wanted to include a sample table for the numbered variants (and did), when I discovered that with {{colort/color}} you can clearly see that they are the result of value or brightness variation in HSV/HSB notation in a constant manner. Hues are sometimes slightly off, though. I didn’t want to include another {{colort}} table, though, because these templates are expensive and the page is already loading slowly.

Has this been documented somewhere so we could reference that and rewrite the section? — Christoph Päper 10:17, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

See my links in the full circle section above which has links to the source definition files. The current version of X11 has them in rgb.txt at [3], though these days they are built into the server as seen at [4]. PaleAqua (talk) 02:27, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

I was asking for a reference (i.e. reliable source) for the brightness values of color variants. The source code is quiet on that. — Christoph Päper 10:11, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

The variants got added by Paul Raveling [5]. See also the README which talks about the 4 variants and raveling.txt which got merged into RGB text. PaleAqua (talk) 21:29, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Ah, I see, thanks. It seems, though, that not all of raveling.txt made it into rgb.txt. — Christoph Päper 15:22, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, and the variants got removed ( for performance reasons ) and later readded at the end. Also, some of the base colors got changed ( often somewhere between thomas.txt and raveling.txt ) wthout the variants being updated. I believe variants follow a highest RGB coordinate being 255, 238, 205, and then 139 from 1 to 4 and the rest of the RGB coordinates scaled relatively to the highest. PaleAqua (talk) 19:53, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Colors

Name	Hex (RGB)	Red (RGB)	Green (RGB)	Blue (RGB)	Hue (HSL/HSV)	Satur. (HSL)	Light (HSL)	Satur. (HSV)	Value (HSV)	found in files
Aquamarine	#29AB97	16%	67%	59%	171°	61%	42%	76%	67%	thomas.txt
Aquamarine	#70DB93	44%	86%	58%	140°	60%	65%	49%	86%	old-rgb.txt
Aquamarine	#7FFFD4	50%	100%	83%	160°	100%	75%	50%	100%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Blue Violet	#7221BC	45%	13%	74%	271°	70%	43%	82%	74%	thomas.txt
Blue Violet	#8A2BE2	54%	17%	89%	271°	76%	53%	81%	89%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Blue Violet	#9F5F9F	62%	37%	62%	300°	25%	50%	40%	62%	old-rgb.txt
Brown	#674300	40%	26%	0%	39°	100%	20%	100%	40%	thomas.txt
Brown	#A52A2A	65%	16%	16%	0°	59%	41%	75%	65%	old-rgb.txt = raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Cadet Blue	#5F999F	37%	60%	62%	186°	25%	50%	40%	62%	raveling.txt
Cadet Blue	#5F9EA0	37%	62%	63%	182°	26%	50%	41%	63%	rgb.txt
Cadet Blue	#5F9F9F	37%	62%	62%	180°	25%	50%	40%	62%	old-rgb.txt
Cadet Blue	#7E7DA0	49%	49%	63%	242°	16%	56%	22%	63%	thomas.txt
Coral	#F88975	97%	54%	46%	9°	90%	72%	53%	97%	thomas.txt
Coral	#FF7256	100%	45%	34%	10°	100%	67%	66%	100%	raveling.txt
Coral	#FF7F00	100%	50%	0%	30°	100%	50%	100%	100%	old-rgb.txt
Coral	#FF7F50	100%	50%	31%	16°	100%	66%	69%	100%	rgb.txt
Cornflower Blue	#222298	13%	13%	60%	240°	63%	37%	78%	60%	raveling.txt
Cornflower Blue	#42426F	26%	26%	44%	240°	25%	35%	41%	44%	old-rgb.txt
Cornflower Blue	#6495ED	39%	58%	93%	219°	79%	66%	58%	93%	rgb.txt = thomas.txt
Dark Green	#005300	0%	33%	0%	120°	100%	16%	100%	33%	raveling.txt = thomas.txt
Dark Green	#006400	0%	39%	0%	120°	100%	20%	100%	39%	rgb.txt
Dark Green	#2F4F2F	18%	31%	18%	120°	25%	25%	41%	31%	old-rgb.txt
Dark Olive Green	#4F4F2F	31%	31%	18%	60°	25%	25%	41%	31%	old-rgb.txt = thomas.txt
Dark Olive Green	#556B2F	33%	42%	18%	82°	39%	30%	56%	42%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Dark Orange	#FF7F00	100%	50%	0%	30°	100%	50%	100%	100%	raveling.txt
Dark Orange	#FF8C00	100%	55%	0%	33°	100%	50%	100%	100%	rgb.txt
Dark Orchid	#6A2566	42%	15%	40%	304°	48%	28%	65%	42%	thomas.txt
Dark Orchid	#9932CC	60%	20%	80%	280°	61%	50%	76%	80%	old-rgb.txt = raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Dark Slate Blue	#333E63	20%	24%	39%	226°	32%	29%	49%	39%	thomas.txt
Dark Slate Blue	#483D8B	28%	24%	55%	249°	39%	39%	56%	55%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Dark Slate Blue	#6B238E	42%	14%	56%	280°	61%	35%	75%	56%	old-rgb.txt
Dark Slate Gray	#2F4F4F	18%	31%	31%	180°	25%	25%	41%	31%	old-rgb.txt = raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Dark Slate Gray	#3C404A	24%	25%	29%	223°	10%	26%	19%	29%	thomas.txt
Dark Slate Grey	#2F4F4F	18%	31%	31%	180°	25%	25%	41%	31%	old-rgb.txt = raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Dark Slate Grey	#3C404A	24%	25%	29%	223°	10%	26%	19%	29%	thomas.txt
Dark Turquoise	#00C3CD	0%	76%	80%	183°	100%	40%	100%	80%	raveling.txt
Dark Turquoise	#00CED1	0%	81%	82%	181°	100%	41%	100%	82%	rgb.txt
Dark Turquoise	#1D6F75	11%	44%	46%	184°	60%	29%	75%	46%	thomas.txt
Dark Turquoise	#7093DB	44%	58%	86%	220°	60%	65%	49%	86%	old-rgb.txt
Dim Gray	#545454	33%	33%	33%	0°	0%	33%	0%	33%	old-rgb.txt
Dim Gray	#696969	41%	41%	41%	0°	0%	41%	0%	41%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt = thomas.txt
Dim Grey	#545454	33%	33%	33%	0°	0%	33%	0%	33%	old-rgb.txt
Dim Grey	#696969	41%	41%	41%	0°	0%	41%	0%	41%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt = thomas.txt
Firebrick	#88120D	53%	7%	5%	2°	83%	29%	90%	53%	thomas.txt
Firebrick	#8E2323	56%	14%	14%	0°	61%	35%	75%	56%	old-rgb.txt
Firebrick	#B22222	70%	13%	13%	0°	68%	42%	81%	70%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Flat Medium Blue	#3A5FCD	23%	37%	80%	225°	60%	52%	72%	80%	raveling.txt
Flat Medium Blue 1	#4876FF	28%	46%	100%	225°	100%	64%	72%	100%	raveling.txt
Flat Medium Blue 2	#436EEE	26%	43%	93%	225°	83%	60%	72%	93%	raveling.txt
Flat Medium Blue 3	#3A5FCD	23%	37%	80%	225°	60%	52%	72%	80%	raveling.txt
Flat Medium Blue 4	#27408B	15%	25%	55%	225°	56%	35%	72%	55%	raveling.txt
Flat Medium Green	#8FBC8F	56%	74%	56%	120°	25%	65%	24%	74%	raveling.txt
Flat Medium Green 1	#C1FFC1	76%	100%	76%	120°	100%	88%	24%	100%	raveling.txt
Flat Medium Green 2	#B4EEB4	71%	93%	71%	120°	63%	82%	24%	93%	raveling.txt
Flat Medium Green 3	#9BCD9B	61%	80%	61%	120°	33%	71%	24%	80%	raveling.txt
Flat Medium Green 4	#698B69	41%	55%	41%	120°	14%	48%	25%	55%	raveling.txt
Forest Green	#228B22	13%	55%	13%	120°	61%	34%	76%	55%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Forest Green	#238E23	14%	56%	14%	120°	61%	35%	75%	56%	old-rgb.txt
Forest Green	#55C034	33%	75%	20%	106°	57%	48%	73%	75%	thomas.txt
Gold	#CC7F32	80%	50%	20%	30°	61%	50%	76%	80%	old-rgb.txt
Gold	#FEC544	100%	77%	27%	42°	99%	63%	73%	100%	thomas.txt
Gold	#FFD700	100%	84%	0%	51°	100%	50%	100%	100%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Goldenrod	#DAA520	85%	65%	13%	43°	74%	49%	85%	86%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt = thomas.txt
Goldenrod	#DBDB70	86%	86%	44%	60°	60%	65%	49%	86%	old-rgb.txt
Gray	#AEAEAE	68%	68%	68%	0°	0%	68%	0%	68%	thomas.txt
Gray	#BEBEBE	75%	75%	75%	0°	0%	75%	0%	75%	rgb.txt
Gray	#C0C0C0	75%	75%	75%	0°	0%	75%	0%	75%	old-rgb.txt = raveling.txt
Green Yellow	#93DB70	58%	86%	44%	100°	60%	65%	49%	86%	old-rgb.txt
Green Yellow	#9FD300	62%	83%	0%	75°	100%	41%	100%	83%	thomas.txt
Green Yellow	#ADFF2F	68%	100%	18%	84°	100%	59%	82%	100%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Grey	#AEAEAE	68%	68%	68%	0°	0%	68%	0%	68%	thomas.txt
Grey	#BEBEBE	75%	75%	75%	0°	0%	75%	0%	75%	rgb.txt
Grey	#C0C0C0	75%	75%	75%	0°	0%	75%	0%	75%	old-rgb.txt = raveling.txt
Honeydew	#F0FFF0	94%	100%	94%	120°	100%	97%	6%	100%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Hot Pink	#FF69B4	100%	41%	71%	330°	100%	71%	59%	100%	rgb.txt
Indian Red	#4F2F2F	31%	18%	18%	0°	25%	25%	41%	31%	old-rgb.txt
Indian Red	#652E2E	40%	18%	18%	0°	37%	29%	55%	40%	thomas.txt
Indian Red	#8B3A3A	55%	23%	23%	0°	41%	39%	58%	55%	raveling.txt
Indian Red	#CD5C5C	80%	36%	36%	0°	53%	58%	55%	80%	rgb.txt
Indigo	#4B0082	29%	0%	51%	275°	100%	26%	100%	51%	rgb.txt
Ivory	#FFFFF0	100%	100%	94%	60°	100%	97%	6%	100%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Khaki	#9F9F5F	62%	62%	37%	60°	25%	50%	40%	62%	old-rgb.txt
Khaki	#BDA76B	74%	65%	42%	44°	38%	58%	43%	74%	thomas.txt
Khaki	#EEE686	93%	90%	53%	55°	75%	73%	44%	93%	raveling.txt
Khaki	#F0E68C	94%	90%	55%	54°	77%	75%	42%	94%	rgb.txt
Light Blue	#ABC5FF	67%	77%	100%	221°	100%	84%	33%	100%	thomas.txt
Light Blue	#ADD8E6	68%	85%	90%	195°	53%	79%	25%	90%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Light Blue	#BFD8D8	75%	85%	85%	180°	24%	80%	12%	85%	old-rgb.txt
Light Gray	#A8A8A8	66%	66%	66%	0°	0%	66%	0%	66%	old-rgb.txt
Light Gray	#D3D3D3	83%	83%	83%	0°	0%	83%	0%	83%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt = thomas.txt
Light Grey	#A8A8A8	66%	66%	66%	0°	0%	66%	0%	66%	old-rgb.txt
Light Grey	#D3D3D3	83%	83%	83%	0°	0%	83%	0%	83%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt = thomas.txt
Light Pink	#FFAEB9	100%	68%	73%	352°	100%	84%	32%	100%	raveling.txt
Light Pink	#FFB6C1	100%	71%	76%	351°	100%	86%	29%	100%	rgb.txt
Light Sky Blue	#87CEFA	53%	81%	98%	203°	92%	76%	46%	98%	rgb.txt
Light Sky Blue	#B0E2FF	69%	89%	100%	202°	100%	85%	31%	100%	raveling.txt
Light Steel Blue	#3498CA	20%	60%	79%	200°	59%	50%	74%	79%	thomas.txt
Light Steel Blue	#8F8FBC	56%	56%	74%	240°	25%	65%	24%	74%	old-rgb.txt
Light Steel Blue	#B0C4DE	69%	77%	87%	214°	41%	78%	21%	87%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Lime Green	#2E9B1C	18%	61%	11%	112°	69%	36%	82%	61%	thomas.txt
Lime Green	#32CC32	20%	80%	20%	120°	61%	50%	76%	80%	old-rgb.txt
Lime Green	#32CD32	20%	80%	20%	120°	61%	50%	76%	80%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Magenta	#FF00D3	100%	0%	83%	310°	100%	50%	100%	100%	thomas.txt
Magenta	#FF00FF	100%	0%	100%	300°	100%	50%	100%	100%	old-rgb.txt = raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Maroon	#670748	40%	3%	28%	319°	87%	22%	93%	40%	thomas.txt
Maroon	#8E236B	56%	14%	42%	320°	61%	35%	75%	56%	old-rgb.txt
Maroon	#B0247C	69%	14%	49%	322°	66%	42%	80%	69%	raveling.txt
Maroon	#B03060	69%	19%	38%	338°	57%	44%	73%	69%	rgb.txt
Medium Aquamarine	#158776	8%	53%	46%	171°	73%	31%	84%	53%	thomas.txt
Medium Aquamarine	#32CC99	20%	80%	60%	160°	61%	50%	76%	80%	old-rgb.txt
Medium Aquamarine	#66CDAA	40%	80%	67%	160°	51%	60%	50%	80%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Medium Blue	#0000CD	0%	0%	80%	240°	100%	40%	100%	80%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Medium Blue	#3232CC	20%	20%	80%	240°	61%	50%	76%	80%	old-rgb.txt
Medium Blue	#3D62D0	24%	38%	82%	225°	61%	53%	71%	82%	thomas.txt
Medium Forest Green	#6B8E23	42%	56%	14%	80°	61%	35%	75%	56%	old-rgb.txt = raveling.txt = thomas.txt
Medium Goldenrod	#B8860B	72%	53%	4%	43°	89%	38%	94%	72%	raveling.txt = thomas.txt
Medium Goldenrod	#EAEAAD	92%	92%	68%	60°	59%	80%	26%	92%	old-rgb.txt
Medium Goldenrod1	#FFB90F	100%	73%	6%	43°	100%	53%	94%	100%	raveling.txt
Medium Goldenrod2	#EEAD0E	93%	68%	5%	43°	89%	49%	94%	93%	raveling.txt
Medium Goldenrod3	#CD950C	80%	58%	5%	43°	89%	43%	94%	80%	raveling.txt
Medium Goldenrod4	#8B6508	55%	40%	3%	43°	89%	29%	94%	55%	raveling.txt
Medium Orchid	#9370DB	58%	44%	86%	260°	60%	65%	49%	86%	old-rgb.txt
Medium Orchid	#AC4DA6	67%	30%	65%	304°	38%	49%	55%	68%	thomas.txt
Medium Orchid	#BA55D3	73%	33%	83%	288°	59%	58%	60%	83%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Medium Pink	#FF7DB3	100%	49%	70%	335°	100%	75%	51%	100%	raveling.txt
Medium Pink 1	#FF7DB3	100%	49%	70%	335°	100%	75%	51%	100%	raveling.txt
Medium Pink 2	#EE74A7	93%	45%	65%	335°	78%	69%	51%	93%	raveling.txt
Medium Pink 3	#CD6490	80%	39%	56%	335°	51%	60%	51%	80%	raveling.txt
Medium Pink 4	#8B4462	55%	27%	38%	335°	34%	41%	51%	55%	raveling.txt
Medium Sea Green	#1B8656	11%	53%	34%	153°	67%	32%	80%	53%	thomas.txt
Medium Sea Green	#3CB371	24%	70%	44%	147°	50%	47%	67%	70%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Medium Sea Green	#426F42	26%	44%	26%	120°	25%	35%	41%	44%	old-rgb.txt
Medium Slate Blue	#5F6D9A	37%	43%	60%	226°	24%	49%	38%	60%	thomas.txt
Medium Slate Blue	#7B68EE	48%	41%	93%	249°	80%	67%	56%	93%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Medium Slate Blue	#7F00FF	50%	0%	100%	270°	100%	50%	100%	100%	old-rgb.txt
Medium Spring Green	#00FA9A	0%	98%	60%	157°	100%	49%	100%	98%	rgb.txt
Medium Spring Green	#3C8D23	24%	55%	14%	106°	60%	35%	75%	55%	thomas.txt
Medium Spring Green	#7FFF00	50%	100%	0%	90°	100%	50%	100%	100%	old-rgb.txt = raveling.txt
Medium Turquoise	#00E3EE	0%	89%	93%	183°	100%	47%	100%	93%	raveling.txt
Medium Turquoise	#3EACB5	24%	67%	71%	185°	49%	48%	66%	71%	thomas.txt
Medium Turquoise	#48D1CC	28%	82%	80%	178°	60%	55%	66%	82%	rgb.txt
Medium Turquoise	#70DBDB	44%	86%	86%	180°	60%	65%	49%	86%	old-rgb.txt
Medium Violet Red	#C71585	78%	8%	52%	322°	81%	43%	89%	78%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt = thomas.txt
Medium Violet Red	#DB7093	86%	44%	58%	340°	60%	65%	49%	86%	old-rgb.txt
Midnight Blue	#0C3E63	5%	24%	39%	206°	78%	22%	88%	39%	thomas.txt
Midnight Blue	#191964	10%	10%	39%	240°	60%	25%	75%	39%	raveling.txt
Midnight Blue	#191970	10%	10%	44%	240°	64%	27%	78%	44%	rgb.txt
Midnight Blue	#2F2F4F	18%	18%	31%	240°	25%	25%	41%	31%	old-rgb.txt
Navy	#000080	0%	0%	50%	240°	100%	25%	100%	50%	rgb.txt
Navy	#00008E	0%	0%	56%	240°	100%	28%	100%	56%	thomas.txt
Navy	#22228B	13%	13%	55%	240°	61%	34%	76%	55%	raveling.txt
Navy	#23238E	14%	14%	56%	240°	61%	35%	75%	56%	old-rgb.txt
Navy Blue	#000080	0%	0%	50%	240°	100%	25%	100%	50%	rgb.txt
Navy Blue	#00008E	0%	0%	56%	240°	100%	28%	100%	56%	thomas.txt
Navy Blue	#22228B	13%	13%	55%	240°	61%	34%	76%	55%	raveling.txt
Navy Blue	#23238E	14%	14%	56%	240°	61%	35%	75%	56%	old-rgb.txt
Old Goldenrod	#EEDD82	93%	87%	51%	51°	76%	72%	45%	93%	raveling.txt
Old Goldenrod 1	#FFEC8B	100%	93%	55%	50°	100%	77%	46%	100%	raveling.txt
Old Goldenrod 2	#EEDC82	93%	86%	51%	50°	76%	72%	45%	93%	raveling.txt
Old Goldenrod 3	#CDBE70	80%	75%	44%	50°	48%	62%	45%	80%	raveling.txt
Old Goldenrod 4	#8B814C	55%	51%	30%	51°	29%	42%	45%	55%	raveling.txt
Old Medium Goldenrod	#EEEEAF	93%	93%	69%	60°	65%	81%	27%	93%	raveling.txt
Old Medium Goldenrod 1	#FFFFBB	100%	100%	73%	60°	100%	87%	27%	100%	raveling.txt
Old Medium Goldenrod 2	#EEEEAE	93%	93%	68%	60°	65%	81%	27%	93%	raveling.txt
Old Medium Goldenrod 3	#CDCD96	80%	80%	59%	60°	36%	70%	27%	80%	raveling.txt
Old Medium Goldenrod 4	#8B8B66	55%	55%	40%	60°	15%	47%	27%	55%	raveling.txt
Olive	#808000	50%	50%	0%	60°	100%	25%	100%	50%	rgb.txt
Orange	#CC3232	80%	20%	20%	0°	61%	50%	76%	80%	old-rgb.txt
Orange	#FF8A00	100%	54%	0%	33°	100%	50%	100%	100%	thomas.txt
Orange	#FFA500	100%	65%	0%	39°	100%	50%	100%	100%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Orange Red	#E2412A	89%	25%	16%	8°	76%	53%	81%	89%	thomas.txt
Orange Red	#FF007F	100%	0%	50%	330°	100%	50%	100%	100%	old-rgb.txt
Orange Red	#FF4500	100%	27%	0%	16°	100%	50%	100%	100%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Orchid	#DA6BD4	85%	42%	83%	303°	60%	64%	51%	86%	thomas.txt
Orchid	#DA70D6	85%	44%	84%	302°	59%	65%	49%	86%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Orchid	#DB70DB	86%	44%	86%	300°	60%	65%	49%	86%	old-rgb.txt
Pale Green	#8FBC8F	56%	74%	56%	120°	25%	65%	24%	74%	old-rgb.txt
Pale Green	#98FB98	60%	98%	60%	120°	93%	79%	39%	98%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Pale Green	#98FF98	60%	100%	60%	120°	100%	80%	40%	100%	thomas.txt
Pale Pink	#FFAAC8	100%	67%	78%	339°	100%	83%	33%	100%	raveling.txt
Pink	#BC8F8F	74%	56%	56%	0°	25%	65%	24%	74%	old-rgb.txt
Pink	#FFAEB9	100%	68%	73%	352°	100%	84%	32%	100%	thomas.txt
Pink	#FFB5C5	100%	71%	77%	347°	100%	86%	29%	100%	raveling.txt
Pink	#FFC0CB	100%	75%	80%	350°	100%	88%	25%	100%	rgb.txt
Plum	#4C2E57	30%	18%	34%	284°	31%	26%	47%	34%	thomas.txt
Plum	#DDA0DD	87%	63%	87%	300°	47%	75%	28%	87%	rgb.txt
Plum	#EAADEA	92%	68%	92%	300°	59%	80%	26%	92%	old-rgb.txt
Plum	#EEAFEE	93%	69%	93%	300°	65%	81%	27%	93%	raveling.txt
Purple	#8A2BE2	54%	17%	89%	271°	76%	53%	81%	89%	raveling.txt
Purple	#A020F0	63%	13%	94%	277°	87%	53%	87%	94%	rgb.txt
Purple	#B000FF	69%	0%	100%	281°	100%	50%	100%	100%	old-rgb.txt
Red	#FF0000	100%	0%	0%	0°	100%	50%	100%	100%	old-rgb.txt = raveling.txt = rgb.txt = thomas.txt
Salmon	#6F4242	44%	26%	26%	0°	25%	35%	41%	44%	old-rgb.txt
Salmon	#F86D68	97%	43%	41%	2°	91%	69%	58%	97%	thomas.txt
Salmon	#FA8072	98%	50%	45%	6°	93%	71%	54%	98%	rgb.txt
Salmon	#FF8C69	100%	55%	41%	14°	100%	71%	59%	100%	raveling.txt
Sandy Brown	#B28F56	70%	56%	34%	37°	37%	52%	52%	70%	thomas.txt
Sandy Brown	#F4A460	96%	64%	38%	28°	87%	67%	61%	96%	old-rgb.txt = raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Sea Green	#238E6B	14%	56%	42%	160°	61%	35%	75%	56%	old-rgb.txt
Sea Green	#2BA770	17%	65%	44%	153°	59%	41%	74%	66%	thomas.txt
Sea Green	#2E8B57	18%	55%	34%	147°	50%	36%	67%	55%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Sienna	#8E6B23	56%	42%	14%	40°	61%	35%	75%	56%	old-rgb.txt = thomas.txt
Sienna	#A0522D	63%	32%	18%	19°	56%	40%	72%	63%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Sky Blue	#008AFF	0%	54%	100%	208°	100%	50%	100%	100%	thomas.txt
Sky Blue	#3299CC	20%	60%	80%	200°	61%	50%	76%	80%	old-rgb.txt
Sky Blue	#87CEEB	53%	81%	92%	197°	71%	73%	43%	92%	rgb.txt
Sky Blue	#87CEFF	53%	81%	100%	205°	100%	77%	47%	100%	raveling.txt
Slate Blue	#007FFF	0%	50%	100%	210°	100%	50%	100%	100%	old-rgb.txt
Slate Blue	#6A5ACD	42%	35%	80%	248°	54%	58%	56%	80%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Slate Blue	#7586BE	46%	53%	75%	226°	36%	60%	38%	75%	thomas.txt
Spring Green	#00FF7F	0%	100%	50%	150°	100%	50%	100%	100%	old-rgb.txt = raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Spring Green	#00FF9F	0%	100%	62%	157°	100%	50%	100%	100%	thomas.txt
Steel Blue	#236B8E	14%	42%	56%	200°	61%	35%	75%	56%	old-rgb.txt
Steel Blue	#377999	22%	47%	60%	200°	47%	41%	64%	60%	thomas.txt
Steel Blue	#4682B4	27%	51%	71%	207°	44%	49%	61%	71%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Tan	#B09B7D	69%	61%	49%	35°	24%	59%	29%	69%	thomas.txt
Tan	#D2B48C	82%	71%	55%	34°	44%	69%	33%	82%	rgb.txt
Tan	#DB9370	86%	58%	44%	20°	60%	65%	49%	86%	old-rgb.txt
Tan	#E19246	88%	57%	27%	29°	72%	58%	69%	88%	raveling.txt
Teal	#008080	0%	50%	50%	180°	100%	25%	100%	50%	rgb.txt
Thistle	#923E70	57%	24%	44%	324°	40%	41%	58%	57%	thomas.txt
Thistle	#D8BFD8	85%	75%	85%	300°	24%	80%	12%	85%	old-rgb.txt = raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Turquoise	#00F5FF	0%	96%	100%	182°	100%	50%	100%	100%	raveling.txt
Turquoise	#40E0D0	25%	88%	82%	174°	72%	57%	71%	88%	rgb.txt
Turquoise	#48D1CC	28%	82%	80%	178°	60%	55%	66%	82%	thomas.txt
Turquoise	#ADEAEA	68%	92%	92%	180°	59%	80%	26%	92%	old-rgb.txt
Violet	#4F2F4F	31%	18%	31%	300°	25%	25%	41%	31%	old-rgb.txt
Violet	#9400D3	58%	0%	83%	282°	100%	41%	100%	83%	thomas.txt
Violet	#EE82EE	93%	51%	93%	300°	76%	72%	45%	93%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Violet Red	#CC3299	80%	20%	60%	320°	61%	50%	76%	80%	old-rgb.txt
Violet Red	#D02090	82%	13%	56%	322°	73%	47%	85%	82%	rgb.txt
Violet Red	#FF0094	100%	0%	58%	325°	100%	50%	100%	100%	thomas.txt
Violet Red	#FF3E96	100%	24%	59%	333°	100%	62%	76%	100%	raveling.txt
Wheat	#D8D8BF	85%	85%	75%	60°	24%	80%	12%	85%	old-rgb.txt
Wheat	#E5C775	90%	78%	46%	44°	68%	68%	49%	90%	thomas.txt
Wheat	#F5DEB3	96%	87%	70%	39°	77%	83%	27%	96%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt
Yellow Green	#4BD300	29%	83%	0%	99°	100%	41%	100%	83%	thomas.txt
Yellow Green	#99CC32	60%	80%	20%	80°	61%	50%	76%	80%	old-rgb.txt
Yellow Green	#9ACD32	60%	80%	20%	80°	61%	50%	76%	80%	raveling.txt = rgb.txt

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on X11 color names. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080502201401/http://cvsweb.xfree86.org:80/cvsweb/*checkout*/xc/programs/rgb/rgb.txt?rev=1.1 to http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/*checkout*/xc/programs/rgb/rgb.txt?rev=1.1
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070928030522/http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/programs/rgb/rgb.txt.diff?r1=1.2&r2=1.1 to http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/programs/rgb/rgb.txt.diff?r1=1.2&r2=1.1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:33, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

"Gainsboro"? "BurlyWood"? What are these things?

Where do these names originate? Equinox ◑ 18:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

The two you list were referenced from Sinclair Paints swatches by Paul Raveling, as were several others.

The rest of the names were mostly either referenced from Crayola crayons by John Thomas, or present in Jim Gettys' original version of the file (not known what he was referencing).

I refer you to Alex Sexton's seminar on the origin of X11 and web colour names for further information.

(For reference: original version, with Raveling edits, with Thomas edits, current version.)

-- HarJIT (talk) 20:28, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

And «hazelnut colour»?

Why isn't the hazelnut colour in this article?

https://color.adobe.com/hazelnut-latte-color-theme-688428/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krotzpyn (talk • contribs) 19:13, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Because it's not in rgb.txt and hence not an X11 colour name. This article is about the X11 colour names, not colour names per se. -- HarJIT (talk) 08:25, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

"Dark Grey" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Dark Grey and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 14#Dark Grey until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Q28 (talk) 05:30, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Link to Gitgub is dead

The link to modern rgb.txt is not valid. Freedesktop project has moved to Gitlab 2A01:112F:430C:E00:7035:808E:3F3E:24FB (talk) 13:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Mistake: Orange and Orange Red RGB Values

Orange #FFA500 Orange Red #FF4500

show the same RGB value so one must be wrong. Perhaps someone could check all of the displayed RGB values against an installed rgb.txt file. Thanks for your efforts :o). GeneThomas2 (talk) 21:34, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

@GeneThomas2: Whilst the R and B components are the same, the G components are different - A5 and 45 respectively. In which section do you see the same values for the two? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:25, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

My mistake. GeneThomas2 (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)