Talk:X610Z
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the X610Z article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Took the commercial aspects out, as far as they were left. Examples of other games, with editorial ok's, offer much more commercial information. This should do the trick. Game is most certainly not nonotable. Unknown by a greater public (compared to a family game like "Monopoly"), but not in its specific area.
Hi everyone. The use of "no evidence of notabilty" as a reason for deletion is not clear. Is it the relevance of the game? This is subjective, since the relevance of a game is not the same for everyone. X610Z is played in different countries by many players and deserves an article, even more since it offers a complete new revolutionary gameplay in its genre: trading card BOARD game.
The simple qualification of "no evidence of notabilty" is not explained by the editors that nominated it for deletion. I see no reasons, no input, seems a little to easy to me.
Thanks and kind regards, Patrick
"X610Z® existenz" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect X610Z® existenz and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#X610Z® existenz until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 05:20, 15 April 2022 (UTC)