This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
It's November 29th, 2023 and I was wondering the same thing because it has been in the top 5 most read articles every day that I've checked the Mobile app homepage for the last week or two. I'm guessing it might be a troll attempt to make a sexually explicit website appear on the front page of Wikipedia, perhaps with the intended purpose to be for the curious to Google "XNXX" since the adult nature of the site might not be obvious to some. Another thought is that people may be searching a search engine for "XNXX" and be subject to search engine filters and/or an Internet firewall that blocks access to the site itself, so Wikipedia's article is likely the first "SFW" search result. TheCrimsonLegacy (talk) 23:54, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This article does not qualifies as a truly Trending Article. It is a Stub. Talk entries are few and far between. It is basically a freebie advertising venue for the website. Wikipedia is a well-run very informative website with majority of articles and content of encyclopedic value. It is not an advertising site. I support removing this article, at least from the Trending format. DonnaW2007 (talk) 10:57, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Trending articles are based on how many people are reading them, not the quality of the article.
If you'd like to see the article removed, you can nominate it at Articles for Deletion. I doubt the nomination will succeed, though; while it's short, it is a well-sourced and relatively well-written article about a clearly notable topic. AntiDionysius (talk) 11:01, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=icon}
Not done: Not a request to edit the article. NotAGenious (talk) 09:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)