Talk:X 2000

Opening heading

When it says "X 2000" (with  ) in the article, shouldn't that be the name of the article too? --80.63.213.182 16:54, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

price

how much does this cost —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.111.188.245 (talk) 22:11, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

See www.sj.se and press the English flag on top.--BIL (talk) 19:31, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Rename

Choose one of these suggestions, or split into two articles.

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 03:15, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

X 2000 → SJ High-speed train or SJ 2000 or split into two articles – Relisted. There were two move requests which would be confusing. If there are two options, discuss them in one request. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:06, 28 January 2012 (UTC) The new name in English used for these train departures. The train models will not be called that, they will be branded SJ 2000 and SJ 3000.-BIL (talk) 19:33, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Could you provide some relevant links so we can verify this, please (I'm not necessarilly saying your wrong, but this whole naming issue is confusing). For Norway, NSB Signatur was redirected to NSB Class 73, and I'm wondering if this should be done here as well (that X 2000 redirects to X2). As it is, the X 2000 article mixes content on the service and the train quite a bit. Further, I am not necessarily convinced that we should rename the article on the trains themselves, as X2 still remains the WP:COMMONNAME. Another issue is if "high-speed train" is a description or a name, if the former, the article should remain at its current location, and if not, it should be capitalized as a proper noun, but this would require me to look at the sources. Another option is to just redirect X 2000 to high-speed rail in Sweden. Another option is to keep the article as it is about a historical service. Arsenikk ^(talk) 19:21, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/sweden

  Triggered by \brailway-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 09:14, 3 April 2014 (UTC)