| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Xceedium article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Badly out of date
editI don't have time to fix anything now, as I am at work, but I just noticed that this is badly out of date. Xceedium is now owned by CA Technologies[1]. Also we need some Wikiprojects on this. I'll try to remember to update this later but if anybody else wants to pre-empt me that would be more than fine. --DanielRigal (talk) 11:12, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- Projects added above. --DanielRigal (talk) 19:21, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- OK. I think I am done with this now. The redlinks are gone. Cruft and repetition is reduced. The acquisition is included and the old stuff is moved into the past tense. I doubt it is perfect but it is a lot better than it was. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:14, 7 July 2017 (UTC)