Talk:Xchanging

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 August 2010. The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

Latest comment: 13 years ago8 comments6 people in discussion

This is definitely biased in favor of the company. So far as I can tell the text was not stolen directly from the company's website. Sophy's Duckling 01:48, 25 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

(Removed. Uncle G (talk) 12:52, 17 September 2010 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.64.206.39 (talk) 15:03, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have noticed that the XCHANGING main page has been locked due to [recent repetitive additions]. Why was this comment regarded as vandalism? How can a fact be vandalism? Are Wikipedia only interested in positive issues regarding a company? Why shouldn't negative comments about a company be allowed if they are true? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.109.242.63 (talk) 15:04, 18 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

(Removed. Uncle G (talk) 12:52, 17 September 2010 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.109.242.63 (talk) 15:12, 18 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Say what? I had originally proposed to delete this page as uninformative advertising. These claims you are making need first to be referenced to reliable sources that other people can check out. Do that, and your case for including them will be much stronger. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 03:18, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
agreed...whoever keeps putting up this unsubstantiated claim needs to back it up with some facts rather than just writing an unreliable statement. Something like this could be considered slander against the person could it not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.7.83.99 (talk) 11:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
- have has to delete the revision about Folkestone. it is made up again. this guy continues to do this, and we will continue to remove it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rowing101 (talk • contribs) 15:21, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pending review lacks citations and links to claims; content is not verifable Rowing101 (talk) 15:00, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Xchanging BM rgb.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An image used in this article, File:Xchanging BM rgb.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Xchanging. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.iua.co.uk/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Xchanging. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Xchanging. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic