Talk:Xenacanthus

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Xenacanthus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Palaeontology Mid‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sharks Mid‑importance

	Sharks portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sharks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sharks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SharksWikipedia:WikiProject SharksTemplate:WikiProject Sharksshark articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fishes Low‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Length

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In the separate 'Xenacanthus' box a length is given. As the box covers a genus, and not a particular species, surely length is not appropriate (unless all the species were the same length). GrahamBould (talk) 00:00, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Is the information on this page valid?

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

The information on this page seems invalid. I'm no expert, but I have seen full skeletons of Xenacanthus, indicating that it is not a shark. Also, Xenacanthus lives in the Cretaceous, not the Devonian! Can someone please make sure that this information is really, well, real? Paleo Kid (talk) 03:55, 24 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Oh yeah, and Xenacanthus was not three feet long, because it was much longer than I am tall, and I'm at least 3 and a half feet tall. Also, the picture even says that it's from a synonym. We need some major cleanup on this page. Paleo Kid (talk) 15:14, 24 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Oh, shoot, I mistakes Xenacanthus for Xiphactinus. Whoops! Sorry. But the picture is still invalid. Paleo Kid (talk) 15:37, 24 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

The diagram shows a synonym of Xenacanthus, so what's the problem? FunkMonk (talk)

18:41, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Don'tcha think that the picture should be of the animal, not just a synonym? Paleo Kid (talk) 14:24, 8 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Over lap with Orthacanthus

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I noticed that there are overlapping species between this genera and Orthacanthus, namely

X. (O.) compressus
X. (O.) gibbosus
X. (O.) gracillis

Could someone get to the bottom of this? Weshawitz (talk) 00:59, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic