Talk:Xenogears/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Neutrality of certain sections is a problem, particularly in the Reception and Critical Response sections. The Characters section veers off topic and should be revised, as should the introduction's last paragraph (to meet MoS standards). Consider creating a more concise summary of the plot (back of the book style), or a more in-depth approach (possibly a sub-article) which could go into much more detail of the game's complex storyline. The very specific, yet incomprehensive plot summary given implies a series of disconnected events that misrepresents the game.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Review: this article is being reviewed (additional comments are welcome). Drb021 (talk) 05:34, 14 October 2008 (UTC)