Talk:Xiaohong Rose Yang
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Cwmhiraeth in topic Did you know nomination
A fact from Xiaohong Rose Yang appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 April 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:40, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Xiaohong Rose Yang (pictured) conducted a genome-wide search for copy number variations to identify the first susceptibility gene for familial chordoma? Source: "Through a genome-wide search for copy number variations (CNVs), Yang identified the first susceptibility gene for familial chordoma—a germline duplication of the T gene that had eluded previous studies that focused on single nucleotide variants." [1]
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Tonia Shand
- Comment: Public domain text is used and identified in the article.
Created by TJMSmith (talk). Self-nominated at 01:46, 26 March 2021 (UTC).
- Article is long and recent enough. There is text similar to the one in the National Cancer Institute, but this shouldn't be a problem if the content is in the public domain. Although I worry that the hook might be too technical for readers and a different phrasing could be considered, it is nevertheless an interesting and concise one, and a different hook could be too long. Overall, the article is in good condition and the hook is appropriate. I have gone ahead and linked the articles with others to remove the orphan tag. Best wishes! --NoonIcarus (talk) 15:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)