Talk:Xinjiang Police Files
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Xinjiang Police Files article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Current 3 sections
editYadsalohcin, thank you for your efforts and for starting this page. I find the organization of the article into the current 3 sections " Sources", "Summary" and "Data and analysis" unfortunate- a bit arbitrary, not reflecting their content, and hence making for a difficult read as to understanding the matter. I actually struggled with the same issue, when writing the China Cables.
I suggest to use a "description" of the contents - since the genesis, the leak of an anonymous source and analysis by the 14 news sources is briefly told. I also detailed the publication in a section "Publication and press reports" which is missing here.
Finally, there definitely needs to be a section of the political reactions or impact, which is likely going to be added to over time. --Wuerzele (talk) 10:44, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Wuerzele, and thanks for this- specially thanks for finding info to include in the section "Political reactions", which I was acutely aware was missing.
- As for the rest of the structure, I am relatively happy with the logic of its sequence, telling where it came from (Sources), what it contained (Summary) and what can be deduced from the data (Data and analysis). But I wouldn't be particularly insistent on any particular structure, as long as there's some clear logic and as long as no important data gets lost from the article. This is after all a public collaborative encyclopaedia and although I'll look in on the page from time to time I don't consider myself a curator or owner, so if someone has a much better layout I'd be happy for it all to change. alternatively, perhaps the current titles need some slight expansion to help clarify... Best, Yadsalohcin (talk) 08:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:08, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
