Wikipedia

Talk:Xochimilco

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Tobiornot2b in topic Pronunciation and Recording
Learn more about this page

Pronunciation and Recording

edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is an audio file placed after the Nahuatl [ʃoːtʃiˈmiːlko], but it does not have the long vowels. Judging from the vowels in the recording and the transcription, it might rather be a Spanish recording. This also poses the question if there is a Spanish pronunciation that has kept the [ʃ] from the Nahuatl loan word. If so, the transcription should be added and the audio should be placed after the correct language. – At the moment I don't feel well enough informed about American Spanish and Nahuatl to make the edit myself. Tobiornot2b (talk) 20:01, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Location

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

According to the Mexican constitution (art. 44) the Federal District and Mexico City are one and the same thing. Therefore it makes no sense to say that Xochimilco is one of the delegaciones of the Federal District and then that it is located south of Mexico City. Even though it was not part of Mexico City long ago, it has been absorbed by it, and at least administratively, it is part of Mexico City. --Alonso 03:55, 8 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Quite possibly the original contributor's intention is to provide its location relative to Mexico City's central district, ie "Mexico City" is being used as shorthand for the city's centre.
In any event, I think there'd be some value in splitting out material on the pre-columbian and modern-day settlements of this same name (each cross-referencing the other, naturally). Might do this once when I get a chance, unless there are strenuous objections.--cjllw | TALK 05:35, 23 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Religion section needs to be cut down

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article is much too full of fine detail. Too much detail for an article on a borough in a city. The poster child for this "too much detail" is the religion section, which seems to have a catalog of every religious location in the borough. It makes sense to have an example, but not needed in each and every one in the whole place. WP is not a travel guide. Hires an editor (talk) 01:53, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Granted. Much of this eventually needs to be condensed with many of the fine details moved to small articles. However, any made before now would have been orphans. Better too much than too little at this stage. Easy enough to fix later. I agree this is not a travel guide, but it is not a quick summary either. It shouldh have a lot more than your average travel handbook. If you really want to see an article with too much detail... check Mexico City. If you want to see something with practially no information, try Iztapalapa (Im working on remedying that one now).Thelmadatter (talk) 02:15, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Xochimilco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Xochimilco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ahuejote is not a juniper

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The text calls ahuejote a "juniper" throughout and even links to the juniper article. The ahuejote tree is properly a willow. Please correct. (For the record, I think no or very few species of juniper would tolerate such waterlogged soils) -- Dysmorodrepanis 87.79.83.143 (talk) 00:56, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Xochimilco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:33, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Xochimilco&oldid=1209382735"