 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The 2,000 members of Xplor International would ask whomever put up the spam notice to look at our web site before taking action again (www.xplor.org)
We will continue to build this page and we will identify ourselves appropriately
Mrprtr (talk) 18:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Dear EvilSpartin, please read my comments to you and follow some of the links. This organization has been around for years and is totally legitimate. BTW, I am only a member, not an employee or officer of the organization
05:17, 7 June 2008 (UTC)William Broddy edp (talk)
I've reinserted this message as information on article talk pages isn't deleted; if this page gets too long we can always archive it.
I assumed that you wanted to 'take it back' as you'd deleted it, so I've struck it out, which is how things are usually taken back (it helps people to be able to see how past discussion has gone. If I am wrong in this assumption you can remove the link through it by deleting the ses in brackets at each end of it.
It would be helpful to keep discussion about the article on this talk page, rather than on editors pages. Restepc (talk) 04:22, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
I added the following citation in early June in response to the notice that there was no citation.
Technology Trends: Xplor Directions Survey, Dr. Keith Davidson PhD, edp, Enterprise Journal, 1998. Example of Xplor industry research on transaction documents and laser printing trends http://esj.com/article.aspx?ID=10229843143PM
I plan to remove the notice on Oct 20 unless someone objects.William Broddy edp (talk) 15:56, 15 October 2008 (UTC)