This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
this article is not up to wikipedia standards. It reports dubious claims from a single, unverified source as facts. It is impossible to estabilish if any of the claims about this weapon are factual or indeed if it was ever used in combat. "For this radical design, the five thin gun barrels are connected behind a reinforced shield: like the five thunder divine machine the gunner could rotate the fuse 72 degrees and swiftly light each barrel with his match" is celebratory and not enciclopedic. The relevance of the whole thing is dubious. 139.18.1.5 (talk) 14:56, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
