This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've just removed an entire paragraph from this article that reads almost like a word-for-word lift from the article's only source (Gunston and Gordon, 1997). As the source is not readily available, this raises concerns about the remainder of the article. I'd like to request that someone with access to this source please check the article for further copyvio issues. If much more has to be deleted, one wonders how this article will stand up as notable. I'd suggest that this article could be merged into the Yak-141 article, as there isn't much more information about this subject to advance it beyond stub-level. ViperNerd (talk) 07:41, 31 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
.png)
