Talk:Yakus v. United States

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Categorization

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why is this in the category "United States Supreme Court original jurisdiction cases?" Yakus was before the Supreme Court on certiorari to the First Circuit. LH2004 (talk) 21:13, 7 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think the contention that Yakus allows an agency to cure an unlawful delegation by limiting its construction of the statute is incorrect. Yakus does not make such a contention and the quoted portion does not lend support to this idea. If this is a concept merely implicitly derived from an nontraditional reading of Yakus, then the article needs to flesh out the idea better. Scalia's statement in Whitman, 531 US 457, 472, though, coupled with the actual Yakus opinion, suggest that this idea is incorrect. I suggest this portion of the impact on Administrative Law be removed absent additional support for the argument. 159.63.79.237 (talk) 23:07, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic